Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,125 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1349

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1560

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1564

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1577

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1582

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1582

[First] hearing set for [07-01-2026]: Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1584

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1608

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1609

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1610

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1655

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1709

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1693

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1720

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1722

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1749

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1753

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1772

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1776

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1784

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1803

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1807

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1821

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1827

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1842

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1845

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1847

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1853

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1854

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1859

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1881

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1939

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1903

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Housing]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1946

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1956

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1957

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2030

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2031

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2035

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2050

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2116

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2152

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2153

Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2164

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2174

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2231

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2244

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2246

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2247

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2255

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]