Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,506 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 506

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 83

Be adopted, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 73

Senate 3rd Reading SCR73 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1297

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1297 Stefani

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 565

Consent Calendar 2nd AB565 Dixon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 88

Special Consent ACR88 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 63

Special Consent ACR63 Tangipa et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 65

Special Consent ACR65 Ward et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 66

Special Consent ACR66 Dixon et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 58

Special Consent ACR58 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 67

Special Consent ACR67 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 68

Special Consent ACR68 Ávila Farías et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 89

Special Consent ACR89 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 62

Special Consent ACR62 Hart et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 87

Special Consent ACR87 Nguyen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 86

Special Consent ACR86 Rivas et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 85

Special Consent ACR85 Garcia et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 84

Special Consent ACR84 Hoover et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 81

Special Consent SCR81 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 82

Special Consent ACR82 Bryan et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 80

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR80 Stefani By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 45

Special Consent ACR45 Quirk-Silva et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 78

Special Consent ACR78 Patel et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 69

Special Consent ACR69 Berman et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 76

Special Consent ACR76 Solache et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 74

Special Consent ACR74 Wilson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 5

Special Consent ACR5 Nguyen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 23

Special Consent ACR23 Quirk-Silva et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 94

Senate 3rd Reading SCR94 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 36

Special Consent ACR36 Carrillo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 73

Special Consent ACR73 Stefani et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 24

Special Consent ACR24 Alanis et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 15

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR15 Alanis et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 771

Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 370

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1004

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 251

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 369

Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1150

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1297

Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 373

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Human Services]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1523

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 223

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Public Safety] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 391

Do pass as amended, and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 565

Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 86

Senate 3rd Reading SCR86 Weber Pierson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 83

Senate 3rd Reading SCR83 Stern et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 75

Senate 3rd Reading SCR75 Weber Pierson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SJR 1

Senate 3rd Reading SJR1 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 101

Unfinished Business SB101 Wiener Concurrence