Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,696 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 388

Unfinished Business SB388 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 398

Unfinished Business SB398 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 410

Unfinished Business SB410 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 413

Unfinished Business SB413 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 464

Unfinished Business SB464 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 471

Unfinished Business SB471 Menjivar Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 482

Unfinished Business SB482 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 486

Unfinished Business SB486 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 497

Unfinished Business SB497 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 499

Unfinished Business SB499 Stern Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 516

Unfinished Business SB516 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 518

Unfinished Business SB518 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 524

Unfinished Business SB524 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 530

Unfinished Business SB530 Richardson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 576

Unfinished Business SB576 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 580

Unfinished Business SB580 Durazo Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 582

Unfinished Business SB582 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 590

Unfinished Business SB590 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 593

Unfinished Business SB593 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 610

Unfinished Business SB610 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 640

Unfinished Business SB640 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 631

Unfinished Business SB631 Richardson Concurrence

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 634

Unfinished Business SB634 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 660

Unfinished Business SB660 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 702

Unfinished Business SB702 Limón et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 748

Unfinished Business SB748 Richardson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 754

Unfinished Business SB754 Durazo Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 791

Unfinished Business SB791 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 800

Unfinished Business SB800 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 852

That the Assembly amendments be concurred in

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 827

Unfinished Business SB827 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 7

Assembly 3rd Reading AB7 Bryan et al. By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 44

Assembly 3rd Reading AB44 Schultz By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 14

Assembly 3rd Reading AB14 Hart et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 36

Assembly 3rd Reading AB36 Soria By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 39

Assembly 3rd Reading AB39 Zbur et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 64

Assembly 3rd Reading AB64 Pacheco et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 76

Assembly 3rd Reading AB76 Alvarez By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 82

Assembly 3rd Reading AB82 Ward et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 86

Assembly 3rd Reading AB86 Boerner By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 246

Assembly 3rd Reading AB246 Bryan et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 250

Assembly 3rd Reading AB250 Aguiar-Curry By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 258

Assembly 3rd Reading AB258 Connolly et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 260

Assembly 3rd Reading AB260 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Limón Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 263

Assembly 3rd Reading AB263 Rogers et al. By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 287

Assembly 3rd Reading AB287 Lackey et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 288

Assembly 3rd Reading AB288 McKinnor et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 289

Assembly 3rd Reading AB289 Haney et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 374

Assembly 3rd Reading AB374 Nguyen et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 382

Assembly 3rd Reading AB382 Berman By Grayson