Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,696 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 564

Assembly 3rd Reading AB564 Haney et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 566

Assembly 3rd Reading AB566 Lowenthal et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 587

Assembly 3rd Reading AB587 Davies By Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 596

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 610

Assembly 3rd Reading AB610 Alvarez By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 628

Assembly 3rd Reading AB628 McKinnor By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 632

Assembly 3rd Reading AB632 Hart et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 650

Assembly 3rd Reading AB650 Papan et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 678

Assembly 3rd Reading AB678 Lee et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 692

Assembly 3rd Reading AB692 Kalra et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 740

Assembly 3rd Reading AB740 Harabedian et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 766

Assembly 3rd Reading AB766 Sharp-Collins et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 777

Assembly 3rd Reading AB777 Celeste Rodriguez By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 798

Assembly 3rd Reading AB798 Calderon et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 851

Assembly 3rd Reading AB851 McKinnor By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 858

Assembly 3rd Reading AB858 Lee et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 889

Assembly 3rd Reading AB889 Hadwick et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 940

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 961

Assembly 3rd Reading AB961 Ávila Farías et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1050

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1050 Schultz et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1064

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1064 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1069

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1069 Bains et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1152

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1152 Patterson By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1172

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1172 Nguyen et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1319

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1319 Schultz et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1324

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1324 Sharp-Collins et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1332

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1332 Ahrens By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1362

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1362 Kalra et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1445

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1445 Haney et al. By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1430

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1430 Bennett By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1466

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1466 Hart By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1527

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1527 Soria et al. By Hurtado Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1529

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1529 H. & C.D. (Haney) By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 3

Unfinished Business SB3 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 30

Unfinished Business SB30 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 41

Unfinished Business SB41 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 71

Unfinished Business SB71 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 241

Unfinished Business SB241 Cervantes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 250

Unfinished Business SB250 Ochoa Bogh Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 253

Unfinished Business SB253 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 257

Unfinished Business SB257 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 263

Unfinished Business SB263 Gonzalez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 283

Unfinished Business SB283 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 304

Unfinished Business SB304 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 312

Unfinished Business SB312 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 333

Unfinished Business SB333 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 338

Unfinished Business SB338 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 359

Unfinished Business SB359 Niello Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 369

Unfinished Business SB369 Padilla Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 371

Unfinished Business SB371 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence