Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,315 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 125

Special Consent ACR125 Alanis

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 159

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR159 Kalra et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 193

Special Consent ACR193 Aguiar-Curry et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 212

Special Consent ACR212 Macedo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 216

Special Consent ACR216 Mark González et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 225

Special Consent ACR225 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 226

Special Consent ACR226 Wilson et al. By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 227

Special Consent ACR227 Sharp-Collins

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 9

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR9 Wallis et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 17

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR17 Celeste Rodriguez By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 29

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR29 Berman et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 108

Special Consent SR108 Hurtado et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 123

Special Consent SR123 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 128

Senate 3rd Reading SR128 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 129

Special Consent SR129 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 130

Senate 3rd Reading SR130 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 131

Special Consent SR131 Durazo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 132

Senate 3rd Reading SR132 Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 134

Senate 3rd Reading SR134 Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 135

Senate 3rd Reading SR135 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 136

Senate 3rd Reading SR136 Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 137

Senate 3rd Reading SR137 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 108

Special Consent SCR108 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 142

Special Consent SCR142 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 188

Special Consent SCR188 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 191

Special Consent SCR191 Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 195

Special Consent SCR195 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 196

Special Consent SCR196 Limón et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 230

Consent Calendar 2nd AB230 Ransom et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1145

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1145 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1199

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1199 Patterson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1278

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1278 Harabedian

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1569

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1569 Davies et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1622

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1622 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1636

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1636 Solache

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1652

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1652 Patterson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1689

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1689 Quirk-Silva

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1756

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1756 Jeff Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1760

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1760 Arambula

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1873

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1873 Bennett

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1912

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1912 Hadwick et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1913

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1913 Soria

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1928

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1928 Fong et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1950

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1950 Harabedian

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1956

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1956 Valencia et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1982

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1982 Lowenthal et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2028

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2028 Chen