Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,348 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 111

Senate 3rd Reading SR111 Padilla et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 111

Senate 3rd Reading SR111 Padilla et al. Reconsider

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 163

Senate 3rd Reading SCR163 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 170

Senate 3rd Reading SCR170 Grayson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 174

Senate 3rd Reading SCR174 Pérez et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 95

Senate 3rd Reading SR95 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 97

Senate 3rd Reading SR97 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 110

Senate 3rd Reading SR110 Grove et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 148

Senate 3rd Reading SCR148 Padilla et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 156

Senate 3rd Reading SCR156 Dahle et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 168

Senate 3rd Reading SCR168 Jones et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 108

Assembly 3rd Reading AB108 Gabriel By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 880

Consent Calendar 2nd SB880 Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 916

Consent Calendar 2nd SB916 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 949

Senate 3rd Reading SB949 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 965

Senate 3rd Reading SB965 Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1038

Senate 3rd Reading SB1038 Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1055

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1055 Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1165

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1165 Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1175

Senate 3rd Reading SB1175 Rubio et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1187

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1187 Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1207

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1207 Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1267

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1267 Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1388

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1388 Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1389

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1389 Dahle

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1405

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1405 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1410

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1410 Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1431

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1431 E. & C.A. (Wiener)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1432

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1432 E. & C.A. (Wiener)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1436

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1436 REV. & TAX. (McNerney)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1443

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1443 ED. (Pérez)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1444

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1444 L., P.E. & R. (Smallwood-Cuevas)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1445

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1445 B., P. & E.D. (Wahab)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 106

Senate 3rd Reading SR106 Cortese et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 130

Special Consent ACR130 Ta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 141

Special Consent ACR141 Ta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 150

Special Consent ACR150 Michelle Rodriguez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 152

Special Consent ACR152 Davies et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 160

Special Consent ACR160 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 161

Special Consent ACR161 Addis et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 170

Special Consent ACR170 Wallis et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 171

Special Consent ACR171 Celeste Rodriguez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 172

Special Consent ACR172 Macedo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 84

Senate 3rd Reading SCR84 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 144

Special Consent SCR144 Seyarto et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 153

Senate 3rd Reading SCR153 Grove et al. By Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 162

Senate 3rd Reading SCR162 Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 165

Senate 3rd Reading SCR165 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 167

Senate 3rd Reading SCR167 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 941

Senate 3rd Reading SB941 Padilla et al