Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,348 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 102

Senate 3rd Reading SR102 Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 107

Senate 3rd Reading SR107 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 115

Senate 2nd Reading SR115 Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 172

Senate 3rd Reading SCR172 Niello et al. By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 177

Senate 3rd Reading SCR177 Weber Pierson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1768

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1768 Bryan et al. By Durazo Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 877

Senate 3rd Reading SB877 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 951

Senate 3rd Reading SB951 Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1013

Senate 3rd Reading SB1013 Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1030

Senate 3rd Reading SB1030 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1046

Senate 3rd Reading SB1046 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1091

Senate 3rd Reading SB1091 Caballero et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1112

Senate 3rd Reading SB1112 Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1116

Senate 3rd Reading SB1116 Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1164

Senate 3rd Reading SB1164 Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1201

Senate 3rd Reading SB1201 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1218

Senate 3rd Reading SB1218 Arreguín et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1312

Senate 3rd Reading SB1312 Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 171

Senate 3rd Reading SCR171 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 868

Senate 3rd Reading SB868 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 872

Senate 3rd Reading SB872 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 874

Senate 3rd Reading SB874 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 881

Senate 3rd Reading SB881 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 884

Senate 3rd Reading SB884 Umberg et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 891

Senate 3rd Reading SB891 Cervantes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 899

Senate 3rd Reading SB899 Grove et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 903

Senate 3rd Reading SB903 Padilla et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 908

Senate 3rd Reading SB908 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 931

Senate 3rd Reading SB931 Laird et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 934

Senate 3rd Reading SB934 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 943

Senate 3rd Reading SB943 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 944

Senate 3rd Reading SB944 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 947

Senate 3rd Reading SB947 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 950

Senate 3rd Reading SB950 Weber Pierson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 957

Senate 3rd Reading SB957 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 959

Senate 3rd Reading SB959 Grayson et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 964

Senate 3rd Reading SB964 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 988

Senate 3rd Reading SB988 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 991

Senate 3rd Reading SB991 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 994

Senate 3rd Reading SB994 Cabaldon et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 998

Senate 3rd Reading SB998 Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1000

Senate 3rd Reading SB1000 Becker Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1003

Senate 3rd Reading SB1003 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1004

Senate 3rd Reading SB1004 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1012

Senate 3rd Reading SB1012 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1014

Senate 3rd Reading SB1014 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1024

Senate 3rd Reading SB1024 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1048

Senate 3rd Reading SB1048 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1049

Senate 3rd Reading SB1049 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1056

Senate 3rd Reading SB1056 Grayson