Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Tom Umberg

Tom Umberg

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 34

In office
2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 34 · 2018–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Tom Umberg represents Senate District 34 and has worked as a prosecutor, military officer, lawyer and officeholder, with departures from and returns to elected office. He first won an Assembly seat in 1990, returned to the Assembly in 2004 and reached the state Senate in 2018 after initially trailing by 19 points on election night. Along the way came an unsuccessful campaign for attorney general, a run for county supervisor and federal work on national drug policy. In Sacramento, his assignments have included committees overseeing elections and the judiciary. His record ranges from same-sex marriage and campaign finance to transitional housing, fentanyl and CARE Courts.

BACKGROUND AND FORMATION

Born in Cincinnati in 1955, Umberg graduated with honors from UCLA in 1977 and received his law degree from UC San Francisco, College of the Law, in 1980. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Army, rose to captain and served with the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea and NATO forces in Italy. His service also included assignments as a paratrooper with the Army Special Operations Command, the Army Special Warfare Center and the XVIIIth Airborne Corps.

Umberg remained in the Army Reserve and rose to colonel. He earned a master’s degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and completed the Kennedy School’s program for senior executives in national security. His decorations include the Bronze Star, two Meritorious Service Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. He met his wife, Brigadier General Robin Umberg, on a military flight to South Korea. They have three children: Brett, Tommy and Erin.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1980, Umberg was appointed an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Orange County and began serving as a military prosecutor, a role he held through 1985. His federal prosecutions included drug dealers, gang members, white-collar criminals and civil-rights cases, with a 100% conviction rate. Among his cases were “Uranium for Tax Dollars” and “Marco Numismatics.”

The turn into electoral politics came on Election Day 1988, when Umberg was the federal prosecutor on duty during the Santa Ana poll guard controversy. He resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s office to run for the Assembly, citing that episode as his reason. In 1990, he defeated incumbent Republican Curt Pringle and was reelected in 1992. He chaired the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, then lost the 1994 attorney general’s race to Dan Lungren.

Umberg later directed Bill Clinton’s 1996 California reelection campaign and served from 1997 to 2000 as deputy director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under Barry McCaffrey. He returned to the Assembly in 2004. In 2005, he supplied the 41st and decisive vote for AB 849, the measure to legalize same-sex marriage in California.

THE RETURN

Umberg sought a state Senate seat in 2006, then ran for the Orange County Board of Supervisors, placing third in 2007 with 21.4% of the vote. His next successful election came in 2018, when he entered the race for the 34th Senate District. He initially trailed by 19 points on election night and ultimately won by 3,200 votes.

Once sworn in, Umberg was named chair of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. In 2021, he became chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and, as chair, held a seat on the Judicial Council of California. As Judiciary Committee chair, he played a key role in the regulation of artificial-intelligence legislation. He was also considered by Gov. Gavin Newsom as a finalist for California attorney general.

The volume of his work is part of the record. Umberg authored more than 60 measures that became law during his Assembly service. In 2025, he introduced 33 bills, the most of any legislator that year.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Umberg’s policymaking has included election financing, transitional housing, CARE Courts and fentanyl. His SB 42 would ask voters to end California’s statewide ban on cities and counties establishing public-financing systems for local elections. His committee assignments have included chairing the Senate committees overseeing elections and the judiciary.

On housing, Umberg authored SB 450 in 2019, creating a California Environmental Quality Act exemption to allow cities and counties to purchase dilapidated hotels and motels and convert them into transitional housing. In 2020, Gov. Newsom implemented Project Homekey, which utilized Umberg’s bill to fund cities and counties purchasing hotels and motels for conversion. Newsom later asked him to author SB 1338, creating the state’s CARE Courts.

Fentanyl has also been part of his record. Umberg authored bills addressing fentanyl abuse and introduced SB 44, “Alexandra’s Law,” in 2023. After that bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee, he reintroduced it with largely the same language as SB 21 in 2024.

Taken together, these measures addressed voters presented with a proposed change to election financing, people needing transitional housing, fentanyl abuse and people reached through CARE Courts. The documented work involved courts, legislative committees, cities and counties; his assignments have included chairing the Senate’s elections and judiciary committees and holding a seat on the Judicial Council of California.

The record

4,348 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1414

Senate 3rd Reading SB1414 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1423

Senate 3rd Reading SB1423 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 73

Unfinished Business SB73 Cervantes et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 925

Senate 3rd Reading SB925 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 873

Senate 3rd Reading SB873 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 878

Senate 3rd Reading SB878 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 886

Senate 3rd Reading SB886 Padilla et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 887

Senate 3rd Reading SB887 Padilla et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 905

Senate 3rd Reading SB905 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 907

Senate 3rd Reading SB907 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 909

Senate 3rd Reading SB909 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 924

Senate 3rd Reading SB924 Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 929

Senate 3rd Reading SB929 Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 942

Senate 3rd Reading SB942 Caballero et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 952

Senate 3rd Reading SB952 Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 954

Senate 3rd Reading SB954 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 958

Senate 3rd Reading SB958 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 973

Senate 3rd Reading SB973 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 983

Senate 3rd Reading SB983 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 992

Senate 3rd Reading SB992 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 996

Senate 3rd Reading SB996 Padilla et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1057

Senate 3rd Reading SB1057 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1092

Senate 3rd Reading SB1092 Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1103

Senate 3rd Reading SB1103 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1114

Senate 3rd Reading SB1114 Cabaldon et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1123

Senate 3rd Reading SB1123 Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1158

Senate 3rd Reading SB1158 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1167

Senate 3rd Reading SB1167 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1233

Senate 3rd Reading SB1233 Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1237

Senate 3rd Reading SB1237 Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1249

Senate 3rd Reading SB1249 Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1257

Senate 3rd Reading SB1257 Arreguín et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1283

Senate 3rd Reading SB1283 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1292

Senate 3rd Reading SB1292 Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1301

Senate 3rd Reading SB1301 Allen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1314

Senate 3rd Reading SB1314 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1367

Senate 3rd Reading SB1367 Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1370

Senate 3rd Reading SB1370 Stern et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1374

Senate 3rd Reading SB1374 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1399

Senate 3rd Reading SB1399 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 888

Special Consent SB888 Seyarto et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 911

Special Consent SB911 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 920

Senate 3rd Reading SB920 Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 927

Special Consent SB927 Choi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 936

Special Consent SB936 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 945

Special Consent SB945 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 946

Special Consent SB946 Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 953

Special Consent SB953 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 955

Special Consent SB955 Blakespear Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 985

Special Consent SB985 Strickland et al