
Concord is the clearest local marker in Tim Grayson’s public career. Before seeking state office, he worked as a construction contractor and served on the Concord City Council. In November 2016, he ran for the California State Assembly, beginning a legislative tenure that continued through 2024. He represented two Assembly districts during those years, then contested Senate District 9 in November 2024. His move into the Assembly also involved a party change: once a Republican, he switched parties to make that run.
BEFORE PUBLIC OFFICE
Grayson was born on September 17, 1967. The available account of his working life before politics is brief but concrete: he was a construction contractor. It does not identify his business, projects or years in the trade.
His first identified public office was on the Concord City Council. That put municipal office before his eight years in the Assembly, although no council dates, votes or policy initiatives are specified. The sequence is the important part of the record: construction work, the Concord council and then a campaign for state office.
That path also kept Concord in the foreground. Grayson’s later offices carried district numbers and broader constituencies, but the local government post identified with him was the council in Concord.
THE PATH TO OFFICE
Grayson ran for the Assembly in November 2016. He had once been a Republican and switched parties to run for the Assembly. No further account of that change, including his reasons for it, is given.
He served in the California State Assembly from 2016 to 2024. From 2016 through 2022, he represented the 14th Assembly District. From 2022 through 2024, he represented the 15th Assembly District. The district designation changed; his Assembly service continued.
In November 2024, Grayson ran for the California State Senate, contesting the 9th District seat. That campaign followed his council service and two successive Assembly district assignments. The documented career is thus an institutional progression: Concord city government, the Assembly and a Senate race.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Grayson’s offices and campaigns are clear. A distinct policy signature is not. No particular legislation, budget decision, committee assignment, appointment, vote or organized cause is identified in the account of his career. Nor does it name a specific constituency or interest whose policy priorities he repeatedly advanced.
It would therefore go beyond the documented facts to label him primarily as a policymaker on housing, labor, public safety, transportation, construction or any other issue. His work as a construction contractor cannot by itself be turned into a legislative agenda, and his party change cannot be assigned a policy meaning without further detail.
What can be said is narrower. Grayson brought experience in construction and Concord municipal office into an Assembly career lasting from 2016 to 2024. He represented the 14th and then the 15th Assembly districts before contesting Senate District 9. For voters looking for the interests he has been most committed to serving through policy, the offices establish the reach of his career; the policy record provided here does not establish the answer.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 14 · former
- State Senate · Senate District 9 · 2024–present
- State Assembly · Assembly District 15 · 2022–
Concord is the clearest local marker in Tim Grayson’s public career. Before seeking state office, he worked as a construction contractor and served on the Concord City Council. In November 2016, he ran for the California State Assembly, beginning a legislative tenure that continued through 2024. He represented two Assembly districts during those years, then contested Senate District 9 in November 2024. His move into the Assembly also involved a party change: once a Republican, he switched parties to make that run.
BEFORE PUBLIC OFFICE
Grayson was born on September 17, 1967. The available account of his working life before politics is brief but concrete: he was a construction contractor. It does not identify his business, projects or years in the trade.
His first identified public office was on the Concord City Council. That put municipal office before his eight years in the Assembly, although no council dates, votes or policy initiatives are specified. The sequence is the important part of the record: construction work, the Concord council and then a campaign for state office.
That path also kept Concord in the foreground. Grayson’s later offices carried district numbers and broader constituencies, but the local government post identified with him was the council in Concord.
THE PATH TO OFFICE
Grayson ran for the Assembly in November 2016. He had once been a Republican and switched parties to run for the Assembly. No further account of that change, including his reasons for it, is given.
He served in the California State Assembly from 2016 to 2024. From 2016 through 2022, he represented the 14th Assembly District. From 2022 through 2024, he represented the 15th Assembly District. The district designation changed; his Assembly service continued.
In November 2024, Grayson ran for the California State Senate, contesting the 9th District seat. That campaign followed his council service and two successive Assembly district assignments. The documented career is thus an institutional progression: Concord city government, the Assembly and a Senate race.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Grayson’s offices and campaigns are clear. A distinct policy signature is not. No particular legislation, budget decision, committee assignment, appointment, vote or organized cause is identified in the account of his career. Nor does it name a specific constituency or interest whose policy priorities he repeatedly advanced.
It would therefore go beyond the documented facts to label him primarily as a policymaker on housing, labor, public safety, transportation, construction or any other issue. His work as a construction contractor cannot by itself be turned into a legislative agenda, and his party change cannot be assigned a policy meaning without further detail.
What can be said is narrower. Grayson brought experience in construction and Concord municipal office into an Assembly career lasting from 2016 to 2024. He represented the 14th and then the 15th Assembly districts before contesting Senate District 9. For voters looking for the interests he has been most committed to serving through policy, the offices establish the reach of his career; the policy record provided here does not establish the answer.
The record
7,365 events, each with its sourceAssembly 3rd Reading AB863 Kalra et al. By Pérez
Assembly 3rd Reading AB876 Flora By Ashby
Assembly 3rd Reading AB876 Flora By Ashby Reconsider
Assembly 3rd Reading AB876 Flora By Ashby
Assembly 3rd Reading AB893 Fong et al. By Cabaldon
Assembly 3rd Reading AB894 Carrillo et al. By Rubio
Assembly 3rd Reading AB900 Papan By Grove
Assembly 3rd Reading AB932 Irwin et al. By Cabaldon
Assembly 3rd Reading AB943 Michelle Rodriguez By Hurtado
Assembly 3rd Reading AB943 Michelle Rodriguez By Hurtado Reconsider
Assembly 3rd Reading AB947 Connolly et al
Assembly 3rd Reading AB960 Garcia et al. By Limón
Assembly 3rd Reading AB987 Sharp-Collins et al. By Wahab
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1003 Calderon By Smallwood-Cuevas
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1004 Wallis By Allen
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1014 Rogers By Seyarto
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1017 Boerner By Becker
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1021 Wicks et al. By Limón
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1026 Wilson et al. By Becker
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1042 Ransom et al. By Hurtado
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1050 Schultz et al. By Grayson
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1061 Quirk-Silva et al. By Wiener
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1223 Nguyen et al. By Cortese
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1230 Bonta et al. By Ochoa Bogh
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1250 Papan By Strickland
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1258 Kalra By Cortese
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1322 AGRI. (Soria) By Caballero
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1339 Mark González et al. By Smallwood-Cuevas
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1384 Nguyen et al. By Richardson
Assembly 3rd Reading AB1408 Irwin et al. By Padilla
Unfinished Business SB9 Arreguín et al. Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB87 Seyarto et al. Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB272 Becker et al. Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB281 Pérez et al. Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB390 Becker et al. Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB480 Archuleta Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB507 Limón Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB650 Cabaldon Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB731 Archuleta Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB757 Richardson Concurrence
Unfinished Business SB764 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence
Consent Calendar 2nd AJR12 Ahrens et al
Assembly 3rd Reading AB49 Muratsuchi et al. By Gonzalez Urgency Clause
Assembly 3rd Reading AB59 Aguiar-Curry By Cabaldon
Assembly 3rd Reading AB87 Boerner By Padilla
Assembly 3rd Reading AB238 Harabedian et al. By Grayson Urgency Clause
Assembly 3rd Reading AB344 Valencia By Ashby
Assembly 3rd Reading AB391 Michelle Rodriguez By Caballero
Assembly 3rd Reading AB414 Pellerin By Laird
Assembly 3rd Reading AB435 Wilson By Cortese