Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Rick Zbur

Rick Zbur

Democratic

State Assembly · Assembly District 51

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

District 51 voters elected Rick Chavez Zbur to the State Assembly in 2022, after a public life that included environmental law, LGBT civil rights and electoral politics. More than a quarter-century earlier, he ran for Congress in a district represented by Republican Steve Horn. Between that race and his Assembly victory, Zbur practiced law, held leadership posts in the California League of Conservation Voters and led Equality California. He is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. In 2025, he also led Assembly opposition to a proposal to increase housing supply and gave a speech defending single-family exclusive zoning.

ROOTS AND THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Zbur was born March 2, 1957, and grew up with his mother, Erlinda Chavez Zbur, on a farm in the Rio Grande Valley of rural New Mexico. He has distant Sephardi Jewish ancestry. His legal career included about three decades practicing environmental law before he retired from Latham & Watkins in 2014.

His work outside the law office included HIV/AIDS advocacy and political fundraising. In the early 1980s, Zbur campaigned against HIV/AIDS and later helped found the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation. In 1992, he organized fundraisers for Bill Clinton and Barbara Boxer; both were elected.

Zbur also became active in California’s environmental movement. From 2011 to 2017, he served as president of the California League of Conservation Voters and as a chair of its board of directors. In 2014, the year he retired from Latham & Watkins, he became executive director of Equality California. He led the LGBT civil rights organization until 2021, part of nearly four decades as a vocal leader in that movement.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1996, Zbur ran for the U.S. House in California’s 38th Congressional District against Republican incumbent Steve Horn. His campaign priorities included environmental protection, Social Security and Medicare. On March 26, Zbur won the Democratic primary, becoming the first openly gay non-incumbent congressional primary candidate to win an election. He lost the general election to Horn.

In April 2020, Zbur said he would run in the 2022 Los Angeles city attorney election. He subsequently decided not to compete for that office. In 2021, he instead announced his candidacy for Assembly District 51.

Zbur won the Assembly primary and then the 2022 general election. His route to the Assembly included a congressional defeat, work in law and advocacy organizations, and a city attorney campaign he later chose not to pursue. He is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Zbur’s documented policy work includes environmental protection, HIV/AIDS and LGBT civil rights. That work has included about three decades of environmental law, service as president of the California League of Conservation Voters from 2011 to 2017, helping found the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation, and leadership of Equality California from 2014 to 2021. His 1996 congressional platform also included Social Security and Medicare.

His Assembly record includes a housing intervention. In 2025, Zbur led Assembly opposition to SB 79, bipartisan legislation to increase California’s housing supply, and gave a speech defending single-family exclusive zoning. He is also a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus.

Zbur’s public work has included campaigning against HIV/AIDS, helping found the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation, advocating for LGBT civil rights and participating in California’s environmental movement. On housing, he gave a 2025 speech defending single-family exclusive zoning. His record also includes leadership of California organizations, electoral campaigns and service in the State Assembly.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 51 · 2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

District 51 voters elected Rick Chavez Zbur to the State Assembly in 2022, after a public life that included environmental law, LGBT civil rights and electoral politics. More than a quarter-century earlier, he ran for Congress in a district represented by Republican Steve Horn. Between that race and his Assembly victory, Zbur practiced law, held leadership posts in the California League of Conservation Voters and led Equality California. He is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. In 2025, he also led Assembly opposition to a proposal to increase housing supply and gave a speech defending single-family exclusive zoning.

ROOTS AND THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB

Zbur was born March 2, 1957, and grew up with his mother, Erlinda Chavez Zbur, on a farm in the Rio Grande Valley of rural New Mexico. He has distant Sephardi Jewish ancestry. His legal career included about three decades practicing environmental law before he retired from Latham & Watkins in 2014.

His work outside the law office included HIV/AIDS advocacy and political fundraising. In the early 1980s, Zbur campaigned against HIV/AIDS and later helped found the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation. In 1992, he organized fundraisers for Bill Clinton and Barbara Boxer; both were elected.

Zbur also became active in California’s environmental movement. From 2011 to 2017, he served as president of the California League of Conservation Voters and as a chair of its board of directors. In 2014, the year he retired from Latham & Watkins, he became executive director of Equality California. He led the LGBT civil rights organization until 2021, part of nearly four decades as a vocal leader in that movement.

THE PATH TO OFFICE

In 1996, Zbur ran for the U.S. House in California’s 38th Congressional District against Republican incumbent Steve Horn. His campaign priorities included environmental protection, Social Security and Medicare. On March 26, Zbur won the Democratic primary, becoming the first openly gay non-incumbent congressional primary candidate to win an election. He lost the general election to Horn.

In April 2020, Zbur said he would run in the 2022 Los Angeles city attorney election. He subsequently decided not to compete for that office. In 2021, he instead announced his candidacy for Assembly District 51.

Zbur won the Assembly primary and then the 2022 general election. His route to the Assembly included a congressional defeat, work in law and advocacy organizations, and a city attorney campaign he later chose not to pursue. He is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Zbur’s documented policy work includes environmental protection, HIV/AIDS and LGBT civil rights. That work has included about three decades of environmental law, service as president of the California League of Conservation Voters from 2011 to 2017, helping found the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation, and leadership of Equality California from 2014 to 2021. His 1996 congressional platform also included Social Security and Medicare.

His Assembly record includes a housing intervention. In 2025, Zbur led Assembly opposition to SB 79, bipartisan legislation to increase California’s housing supply, and gave a speech defending single-family exclusive zoning. He is also a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus.

Zbur’s public work has included campaigning against HIV/AIDS, helping found the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation, advocating for LGBT civil rights and participating in California’s environmental movement. On housing, he gave a 2025 speech defending single-family exclusive zoning. His record also includes leadership of California organizations, electoral campaigns and service in the State Assembly.

The record

5,288 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1619

AB 1619 Valencia Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1630

AB 1630 Caloza Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1640

AB 1640 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1646

AB 1646 Bryan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1661

AB 1661 Bryan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1662

AB 1662 Wilson Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1668

AB 1668 Pellerin Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1679

AB 1679 Mark González Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1681

AB 1681 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1685

AB 1685 Lackey Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1687

AB 1687 Lackey Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1696

AB 1696 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1715

AB 1715 Schiavo Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1731

AB 1731 Wilson Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1734

AB 1734 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1743

AB 1743 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1746

AB 1746 Davies Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1753

AB 1753 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1754

AB 1754 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1755

AB 1755 Sharp-Collins Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1759

AB 1759 Elhawary Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1769

AB 1769 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1775

AB 1775 Ward Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1787

AB 1787 Schultz Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1789

AB 1789 Boerner Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1796

AB 1796 Jackson Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1810

AB 1810 Berman Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1812

AB 1812 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1815

AB 1815 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1818

AB 1818 Ortega Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1820

AB 1820 Schiavo Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1827

AB 1827 Chen Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1831

AB 1831 Ahrens Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1841

AB 1841 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1842

AB 1842 Harabedian Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1847

AB 1847 Harabedian Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1856

AB 1856 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1864

AB 1864 Berman Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1868

AB 1868 Gallagher Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1882

AB 1882 Ellis Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1927

AB 1927 Krell Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1889

AB 1889 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1891

AB 1891 Connolly Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1897

AB 1897 Haney Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1901

AB 1901 Berman Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1903

AB 1903 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1910

AB 1910 Boerner Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1933

AB 1933 Hoover Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1939

AB 1939 Flora Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1940

AB 1940 Calderon Assembly Third Reading