Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,987 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 613

Senate 3rd Reading SB613 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 433

Senate 3rd Reading SB433 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 435

Senate 3rd Reading SB435 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 771

Senate 3rd Reading SB771 Stern

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 601

Senate 3rd Reading SB601 Allen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 84

Senate 3rd Reading SB84 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 596

Senate 3rd Reading SB596 Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 595

Special Consent SB595 Choi

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 86

Special Consent SB86 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 451

Special Consent SB451 Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 453

Senate 3rd Reading SB453 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 586

Senate 3rd Reading SB586 Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 569

Senate 3rd Reading SB569 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 471

Special Consent SB471 Menjivar

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 562

Senate 3rd Reading SB562 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 472

Senate 3rd Reading SB472 Stern et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 634

Senate 3rd Reading SB634 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 326

Senate 3rd Reading SB326 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 783

Senate 3rd Reading SB783 Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 292

Senate 3rd Reading SB292 Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 295

Senate 3rd Reading SB295 Hurtado et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 316

Senate 3rd Reading SB316 Reyes By Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 788

Senate 3rd Reading SB788 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 791

Senate 3rd Reading SB791 Cortese et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 825

Senate 3rd Reading SB825 Limón et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 720

Senate 3rd Reading SB720 Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 833

Senate 3rd Reading SB833 McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 709

Senate 3rd Reading SB709 Menjivar et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 707

Senate 3rd Reading SB707 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 841

Senate 3rd Reading SB841 Rubio

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 692

Senate 3rd Reading SB692 Arreguín et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 690

Senate 3rd Reading SB690 Caballero et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 682

Senate 3rd Reading SB682 Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 676

Senate 3rd Reading SB676 Limón et al

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 672

Senate 3rd Reading SB672 Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 663

Senate 3rd Reading SB663 Allen et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 643

Senate 3rd Reading SB643 Caballero et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 642

Senate 3rd Reading SB642 Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 641

Senate 3rd Reading SB641 Ashby et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 635

Senate 3rd Reading SB635 Durazo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 630

Senate 3rd Reading SB630 Allen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 629

Senate 3rd Reading SB629 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 625

Senate 3rd Reading SB625 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 616

Senate 3rd Reading SB616 Rubio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 97

Senate 3rd Reading SB97 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 610

Senate 3rd Reading SB610 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 582

Senate 3rd Reading SB582 Stern et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 581

Senate 3rd Reading SB581 McGuire et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 571

Senate 3rd Reading SB571 Archuleta et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 567

Senate 3rd Reading SB567 Limón