Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,987 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1339

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1339 Mark González et al. By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1384

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1384 Nguyen et al. By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1408

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1408 Irwin et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 9

Unfinished Business SB9 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 87

Unfinished Business SB87 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 272

Unfinished Business SB272 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 281

Unfinished Business SB281 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 390

Unfinished Business SB390 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 480

Unfinished Business SB480 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 507

Unfinished Business SB507 Limón Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 650

Unfinished Business SB650 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 731

Unfinished Business SB731 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 757

Unfinished Business SB757 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 764

Unfinished Business SB764 Weber Pierson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 12

Consent Calendar 2nd AJR12 Ahrens et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 49

Assembly 3rd Reading AB49 Muratsuchi et al. By Gonzalez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 59

Assembly 3rd Reading AB59 Aguiar-Curry By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 87

Assembly 3rd Reading AB87 Boerner By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 238

Assembly 3rd Reading AB238 Harabedian et al. By Grayson Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 344

Assembly 3rd Reading AB344 Valencia By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 391

Assembly 3rd Reading AB391 Michelle Rodriguez By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 414

Assembly 3rd Reading AB414 Pellerin By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 435

Assembly 3rd Reading AB435 Wilson By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 438

Assembly 3rd Reading AB438 Hadwick By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 482

Assembly 3rd Reading AB482 Solache By Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 492

Assembly 3rd Reading AB492 Valencia et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 503

Assembly 3rd Reading AB503 Mark González By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 516

Assembly 3rd Reading AB516 Kalra et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 571

Assembly 3rd Reading AB571 Quirk-Silva et al. By Archuleta Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 574

Assembly 3rd Reading AB574 Mark González et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 581

Assembly 3rd Reading AB581 Bennett By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 583

Assembly 3rd Reading AB583 Pellerin By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 627

Assembly 3rd Reading AB627 Stefani et al. By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 652

Assembly 3rd Reading AB652 Alvarez By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 671

Assembly 3rd Reading AB671 Wicks et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 696

Assembly 3rd Reading AB696 Ransom et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1008

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1008 Addis By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1150

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1150 Schultz By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1154

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1154 Carrillo By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1175

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1175 Irwin By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1213

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1213 Stefani By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1255

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1255 ED. (Muratsuchi) By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1369

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1369 Ramos By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1523

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1523 JUD. (Kalra) By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 81

Unfinished Business SB81 Arreguín et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 98

Unfinished Business SB98 Pérez et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 303

Unfinished Business SB303 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 346

Unfinished Business SB346 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 391

Unfinished Business SB391 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 395

Unfinished Business SB395 Wiener et al. Concurrence