Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,987 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 833

Assembly 3rd Reading AB833 Alvarez By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 848

Special Consent AB848 Soria

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 931

Assembly 3rd Reading AB931 Kalra By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 993

Special Consent AB993 Hadwick

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 996

Special Consent AB996 Pellerin

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1002

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1002 Gabriel et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1046

Special Consent AB1046 Bains

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1067

Special Consent AB1067 Quirk-Silva

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1072

Special Consent AB1072 Pellerin

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1076

Special Consent AB1076 Addis

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1087

Special Consent AB1087 Patterson By Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1134

Special Consent AB1134 Bains et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1136

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1136 Ortega et al. By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1200

Special Consent AB1200 Caloza

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1225

Special Consent AB1225 Bennett et al. By Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1239

Special Consent AB1239 Dixon et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1285

Special Consent AB1285 E.M. (Ransom)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1299

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1299 Bryan et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1306

Special Consent AB1306 Muratsuchi

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1309

Special Consent AB1309 Flora By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1314

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1314 Ahrens By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1344

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1344 Irwin et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1370

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1370 Patterson et al. By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1374

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1374 Berman et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1398

Special Consent AB1398 Valencia

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1415

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1415 Bonta et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1438

Special Consent AB1438 Gallagher By Ochoa Bogh Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1508

Special Consent AB1508 M. & V.A. (Schiavo) By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 31

Unfinished Business SB31 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 230

Unfinished Business SB230 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 276

Unfinished Business SB276 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 412

Unfinished Business SB412 Limón et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 443

Unfinished Business SB443 Rubio Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 489

Unfinished Business SB489 Arreguín Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 617

Unfinished Business SB617 Arreguín Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 782

Unfinished Business SB782 Pérez Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 30

Assembly 3rd Reading AB30 Alvarez et al. By Richardson Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 43

Assembly 3rd Reading AB43 Schultz By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 221

Assembly 3rd Reading AB221 Ramos et al. By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 224

Assembly 3rd Reading AB224 Bonta et al. By Menjivar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 248

Assembly 3rd Reading AB248 Bryan et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 293

Assembly 3rd Reading AB293 Bennett By Hurtado

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 309

Assembly 3rd Reading AB309 Zbur et al. By Padilla Final Vote

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 310

Assembly 3rd Reading AB310 Alanis et al. By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 348

Assembly 3rd Reading AB348 Krell et al. By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 361

Assembly 3rd Reading AB361 Schultz By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 365

Assembly 3rd Reading AB365 Schiavo By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 373

Assembly 3rd Reading AB373 Blanca Rubio By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 406

Assembly 3rd Reading AB406 Schiavo By Smallwood-Cuevas Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 416

Assembly 3rd Reading AB416 Krell et al. By Menjivar