Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,987 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1513

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1513 ELECTIONS (Pellerin) By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1514

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1514 L. & E. (Ortega) By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1521

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1521 JUD. (Kalra) By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1532

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1532 C. & C. (Boerner) By McNerney Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1533

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1533 Wicks By Caballero Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 62

Unfinished Business SB62 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 221

Unfinished Business SB221 Ochoa Bogh et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 358

Unfinished Business SB358 Becker Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 362

Unfinished Business SB362 Grayson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 484

Unfinished Business SB484 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 639

Unfinished Business SB639 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 653

Unfinished Business SB653 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 783

Unfinished Business SB783 Rubio et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 785

Unfinished Business SB785 Caballero Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 862

Unfinished Business SB862 HEALTH (Menjivar) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 863

Unfinished Business SB863 REV. & TAX. (McNerney) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 42

Special Consent AB42 Bryan

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 79

Special Consent AB79 Arambula By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 81

Special Consent AB81 Ta et al. By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 88

Special Consent AB88 Ta et al. By Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 94

Assembly 3rd Reading AB94 Bennett By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 220

Special Consent AB220 Jackson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 239

Assembly 3rd Reading AB239 Harabedian et al. By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 251

Assembly 3rd Reading AB251 Kalra By Wahab

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 321

Assembly 3rd Reading AB321 Schultz et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 323

Special Consent AB323 Fong et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 339

Assembly 3rd Reading AB339 Ortega By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 343

Special Consent AB343 Pacheco et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 352

Assembly 3rd Reading AB352 Pacheco By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 399

Assembly 3rd Reading AB399 Boerner et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 413

Special Consent AB413 Fong

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 424

Special Consent AB424 Davies

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 480

Special Consent AB480 Quirk-Silva By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 486

Special Consent AB486 Lackey

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 489

Special Consent AB489 Bonta et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 509

Assembly 3rd Reading AB509 Flora By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 542

Special Consent AB542 Celeste Rodriguez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 563

Special Consent AB563 Jackson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 568

Assembly 3rd Reading AB568 Macedo By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 592

Assembly 3rd Reading AB592 Gabriel et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 620

Special Consent AB620 Jackson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 645

Special Consent AB645 Carrillo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 651

Special Consent AB651 Bryan et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 681

Assembly 3rd Reading AB681 Elhawary By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 697

Assembly 3rd Reading AB697 Wilson By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 759

Special Consent AB759 Valencia By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 774

Special Consent AB774 Bauer-Kahan

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 779

Assembly 3rd Reading AB779 Lackey et al. By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 790

Special Consent AB790 Ávila Farías et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 830

Assembly 3rd Reading AB830 Rogers By Grove