Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,987 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 590

Unfinished Business SB590 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 593

Unfinished Business SB593 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 610

Unfinished Business SB610 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 640

Unfinished Business SB640 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 631

Unfinished Business SB631 Richardson Concurrence

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 634

Unfinished Business SB634 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 660

Unfinished Business SB660 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 702

Unfinished Business SB702 Limón et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 748

Unfinished Business SB748 Richardson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 754

Unfinished Business SB754 Durazo Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 791

Unfinished Business SB791 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 800

Unfinished Business SB800 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 830

That the Assembly amendments be concurred in

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 7

Assembly 3rd Reading AB7 Bryan et al. By Richardson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 44

Assembly 3rd Reading AB44 Schultz By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 14

Assembly 3rd Reading AB14 Hart et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 36

Assembly 3rd Reading AB36 Soria By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 39

Assembly 3rd Reading AB39 Zbur et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 64

Assembly 3rd Reading AB64 Pacheco et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 76

Assembly 3rd Reading AB76 Alvarez By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 82

Assembly 3rd Reading AB82 Ward et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 86

Assembly 3rd Reading AB86 Boerner By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 246

Assembly 3rd Reading AB246 Bryan et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 250

Assembly 3rd Reading AB250 Aguiar-Curry By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 258

Assembly 3rd Reading AB258 Connolly et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 260

Assembly 3rd Reading AB260 Aguiar-Curry et al. By Limón Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 263

Assembly 3rd Reading AB263 Rogers et al. By McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 287

Assembly 3rd Reading AB287 Lackey et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 288

Assembly 3rd Reading AB288 McKinnor et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 289

Assembly 3rd Reading AB289 Haney et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 374

Assembly 3rd Reading AB374 Nguyen et al. By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 382

Assembly 3rd Reading AB382 Berman By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 432

Assembly 3rd Reading AB432 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 450

Assembly 3rd Reading AB450 Carrillo et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 460

Assembly 3rd Reading AB460 Chen By Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 461

Assembly 3rd Reading AB461 Ahrens et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 474

Assembly 3rd Reading AB474 Ward By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 483

Assembly 3rd Reading AB483 Irwin By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 512

Assembly 3rd Reading AB512 Harabedian et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 515

Assembly 3rd Reading AB515 Pacheco By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 518

Assembly 3rd Reading AB518 Ward et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 524

Assembly 3rd Reading AB524 Wilson et al. By Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 527

Assembly 3rd Reading AB527 Papan et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 543

Assembly 3rd Reading AB543 Mark González et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 573

Assembly 3rd Reading AB573 Rogers et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 554

Assembly 3rd Reading AB554 Mark González et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 561

Assembly 3rd Reading AB561 Quirk-Silva By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 606

Assembly 3rd Reading AB606 Quirk-Silva By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 621

Assembly 3rd Reading AB621 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 640

Assembly 3rd Reading AB640 Muratsuchi et al. By Pérez