Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,987 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 509

Unfinished Business SB509 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 517

Unfinished Business SB517 Niello Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 533

Unfinished Business SB533 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 571

Unfinished Business SB571 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 578

Unfinished Business SB578 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 586

Unfinished Business SB586 Jones et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 595

Unfinished Business SB595 Choi Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 624

Special Consent SB624 Caballero et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 627

Unfinished Business SB627 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 627

Unfinished Business SB627 Wiener et al. Concurrence Reconsider

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 627

Unfinished Business SB627 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 655

Unfinished Business SB655 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 663

Unfinished Business SB663 Allen et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 669

Unfinished Business SB669 McGuire et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 683

Unfinished Business SB683 Cortese Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 686

Special Consent SB686 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 709

Unfinished Business SB709 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 710

Unfinished Business SB710 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 711

Unfinished Business SB711 McNerney Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 717

Unfinished Business SB717 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 766

Unfinished Business SB766 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 771

Unfinished Business SB771 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 779

Unfinished Business SB779 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 792

Unfinished Business SB792 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 70

Assembly 3rd Reading AB70 Aguiar-Curry By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 93

Assembly 3rd Reading AB93 Papan By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 243

Assembly 3rd Reading AB243 Ahrens By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 247

Assembly 3rd Reading AB247 Bryan et al. By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 268

Assembly 3rd Reading AB268 Kalra et al. By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 338

Assembly 3rd Reading AB338 Solache By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 419

Assembly 3rd Reading AB419 Connolly By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 422

Assembly 3rd Reading AB422 Jackson By Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 495

Assembly 3rd Reading AB495 Celeste Rodriguez By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 507

Assembly 3rd Reading AB507 Haney et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 538

Assembly 3rd Reading AB538 Berman By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 564

Assembly 3rd Reading AB564 Haney et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 566

Assembly 3rd Reading AB566 Lowenthal et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 587

Assembly 3rd Reading AB587 Davies By Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 610

Assembly 3rd Reading AB610 Alvarez By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 628

Assembly 3rd Reading AB628 McKinnor By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 632

Assembly 3rd Reading AB632 Hart et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 650

Assembly 3rd Reading AB650 Papan et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 678

Assembly 3rd Reading AB678 Lee et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 692

Assembly 3rd Reading AB692 Kalra et al. By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 740

Assembly 3rd Reading AB740 Harabedian et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 766

Assembly 3rd Reading AB766 Sharp-Collins et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 777

Assembly 3rd Reading AB777 Celeste Rodriguez By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 798

Assembly 3rd Reading AB798 Calderon et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 851

Assembly 3rd Reading AB851 McKinnor By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 858

Assembly 3rd Reading AB858 Lee et al. By Durazo