Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,614 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 902

Unfinished Business SB902 Grayson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 994

Unfinished Business SB994 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1175

Unfinished Business SB1175 Rubio et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1193

Unfinished Business SB1193 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1196

Unfinished Business SB1196 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1274

Unfinished Business SB1274 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1307

Unfinished Business SB1307 Jones Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1375

Unfinished Business SB1375 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1381

Unfinished Business SB1381 Cervantes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1112

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1112 Wallis By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1551

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1551 Krell By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1637

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1637 Caloza By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1647

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1647 Bryan et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1656

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1656 Davies By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1657

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1657 Rogers et al. By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1660

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1660 Schiavo By Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1712

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1712 Pacheco By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1817

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1817 Addis By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1875

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1875 Hart et al. By Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1892

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1892 Davies By Choi

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1894

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1894 Blanca Rubio By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1908

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1908 McKinnor et al. By Durazo Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1910

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1910 Boerner By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1954

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1954 Ward By Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1957

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1957 Pacheco By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1977

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1977 Irwin By Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2001

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2001 Stefani By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2052

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2052 Stefani By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2107

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2107 Pellerin By Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2224

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2224 Hadwick et al. By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2263

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2263 Kalra et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2346

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2346 Wilson et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2476

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2476 Ellis By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2503

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2503 Wallis By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2523

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2523 Fong By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2538

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2538 Macedo et al. By Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2595

Assembly 3rd Reading AB2595 Papan By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 607

Unfinished Business SB607 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 832

Unfinished Business SB832 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 918

Unfinished Business SB918 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 930

Unfinished Business SB930 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 952

Unfinished Business SB952 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1005

Unfinished Business SB1005 Caballero et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1055

Unfinished Business SB1055 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1082

Unfinished Business SB1082 Niello Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1129

Unfinished Business SB1129 Caballero Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1253

Unfinished Business SB1253 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1285

Unfinished Business SB1285 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 61

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR61 Stefani et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 107

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR107 Bauer-Kahan By Laird