Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,837 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 149

Assembly 3rd Reading AB149 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 154

Assembly 3rd Reading AB154 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 226

Assembly 3rd Reading AB226 Calderon et al. By Umberg Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 234

Assembly 3rd Reading AB234 Calderon et al. By Caballero Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 299

Assembly 3rd Reading AB299 Gabriel et al. By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 366

Assembly 3rd Reading AB366 Petrie-Norris et al. By Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 378

Assembly 3rd Reading AB378 Valencia et al. By Cervantes

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 572

Assembly 3rd Reading AB572 Kalra et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 596

Assembly 2nd Reading AB596 Ortega By Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 695

Assembly 3rd Reading AB695 Fong et al. By Rubio Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 715

Assembly 2nd Reading AB715 Zbur et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 732

Assembly 3rd Reading AB732 Macedo By McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 789

Assembly 3rd Reading AB789 Bonta et al. By Cabaldon

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 808

Assembly 3rd Reading AB808 Addis By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 825

Assembly 2nd Reading AB825 Petrie-Norris et al. By Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 847

Assembly 3rd Reading AB847 Sharp-Collins et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 870

Assembly 2nd Reading AB870 Hadwick By Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 881

Assembly 3rd Reading AB881 Petrie-Norris et al. By Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 888

Assembly 3rd Reading AB888 Calderon et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 940

Assembly 2nd Reading AB940 Wicks et al. By Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 962

Assembly 3rd Reading AB962 Hoover By Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 963

Assembly 3rd Reading AB963 Petrie-Norris By Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1036

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1036 Schultz By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1043

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1043 Wicks et al. By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1079

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1079 Ávila Farías By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1084

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1084 Zbur et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1098

Assembly 2nd Reading AB1098 Fong et al. By Padilla

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1108

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1108 Hart et al. By Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1127

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1127 Gabriel et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1143

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1143 Bennett By Limón

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1156

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1156 Wicks By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1178

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1178 Pacheco et al. By Archuleta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1207

Assembly 2nd Reading AB1207 Irwin et al. By Limón Urgency Clause

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1231

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1231 Elhawary et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1273

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1273 Patterson By Becker

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1376

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1376 Bonta et al. By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1388

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1388 Bryan By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1454

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1454 Rivas et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 7

Unfinished Business SB7 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 11

Unfinished Business SB11 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 22

Unfinished Business SB22 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 24

Unfinished Business SB24 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 27

Unfinished Business SB27 Umberg Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 37

Unfinished Business SB37 Umberg Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 42

Unfinished Business SB42 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 48

W/O REF. TO FILE SB48 Gonzalez