Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,837 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 613

Unfinished Business SB613 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 614

Unfinished Business SB614 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 616

Unfinished Business SB616 Rubio et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 629

Unfinished Business SB629 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 635

Unfinished Business SB635 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 638

Unfinished Business SB638 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 641

Unfinished Business SB641 Ashby et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 646

Unfinished Business SB646 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 647

Unfinished Business SB647 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 682

Unfinished Business SB682 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 703

Unfinished Business SB703 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 707

Unfinished Business SB707 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 720

Unfinished Business SB720 Ashby et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 733

Unfinished Business SB733 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 744

Unfinished Business SB744 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 756

Unfinished Business SB756 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 760

Unfinished Business SB760 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 763

Unfinished Business SB763 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 767

Unfinished Business SB767 Richardson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 775

Unfinished Business SB775 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 776

Unfinished Business SB776 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 787

Unfinished Business SB787 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 809

Unfinished Business SB809 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 822

Unfinished Business SB822 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 839

Unfinished Business SB839 Laird Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 840

W/O REF. TO FILE SB840 Limón

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 840

W/O REF. TO FILE SB840 Limón Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 848

Unfinished Business SB848 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 851

Unfinished Business SB851 Cervantes et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 861

Unfinished Business SB861 B., P. & E.D. (Ashby) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 66

Special Consent SR66 McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 767

Unfinished Business SB767 Richardson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 774

Unfinished Business SB774 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 775

Unfinished Business SB775 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 776

Unfinished Business SB776 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 777

Unfinished Business SB777 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 787

Unfinished Business SB787 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 809

Unfinished Business SB809 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 822

Unfinished Business SB822 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 838

Unfinished Business SB838 Durazo Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 839

Unfinished Business SB839 Laird Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 840

W/O REF. TO FILE SB840 Limón

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 848

Unfinished Business SB848 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 851

Unfinished Business SB851 Cervantes et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 861

Unfinished Business SB861 B., P. & E.D. (Ashby) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 66

Special Consent SR66 McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 105

Senate 3rd Reading SCR105 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 8

Assembly 3rd Reading AB8 Aguiar-Curry By Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 45

Assembly 3rd Reading AB45 Bauer-Kahan et al. By Menjivar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 144

Assembly 3rd Reading AB144 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener