Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,837 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 795

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Natural Resources and Water] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 811

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 828

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 327

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 742

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 106

Senate 3rd Reading SCR106 Choi

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 505

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 546

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 700

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 226

Assembly 3rd Reading AB226 Calderon et al. By Umberg Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 825

Assembly 2nd Reading AB825 Petrie-Norris et al. By Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 888

Assembly 3rd Reading AB888 Calderon et al. By Grayson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1207

Assembly 2nd Reading AB1207 Irwin et al. By Limón Urgency Clause

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1231

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1231 Elhawary et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 11

Unfinished Business SB11 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 42

Unfinished Business SB42 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 48

W/O REF. TO FILE SB48 Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 53

Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 57

Unfinished Business SB57 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 59

Unfinished Business SB59 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 63

Unfinished Business SB63 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 67

Unfinished Business SB67 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 75

Unfinished Business SB75 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 80

Unfinished Business SB80 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 155

Unfinished Business SB155 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 158

W/O REF. TO FILE SB158 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 237

W/O REF. TO FILE SB237 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 245

Unfinished Business SB245 Reyes Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 254

W/O REF. TO FILE SB254 Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 254

W/O REF. TO FILE SB254 Becker Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 271

Unfinished Business SB271 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 274

Unfinished Business SB274 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 294

Unfinished Business SB294 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 326

Unfinished Business SB326 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 351

Unfinished Business SB351 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 352

W/O REF. TO FILE SB352 Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 378

Unfinished Business SB378 Wiener Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 404

Unfinished Business SB404 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 414

Unfinished Business SB414 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 415

Unfinished Business SB415 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 429

Unfinished Business SB429 Cortese et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 451

Unfinished Business SB451 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 461

Unfinished Business SB461 Padilla Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 487

Unfinished Business SB487 Grayson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 495

Unfinished Business SB495 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 541

Unfinished Business SB541 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 547

Unfinished Business SB547 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 553

Unfinished Business SB553 Cortese Concurrence