Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,693 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 129

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR129 Haney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 164

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR164 Bains et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 166

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR166 Ávila Farías et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 179

Senate 3rd Reading SCR179 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 867

Special Consent SB867 Padilla et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 894

Special Consent SB894 Allen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 900

Special Consent SB900 McNerney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 962

Special Consent SB962 Archuleta

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 995

Senate 3rd Reading SB995 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1022

Special Consent SB1022 Valladares et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1025

Senate 3rd Reading SB1025 Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1047

Special Consent SB1047 Niello et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1050

Senate 3rd Reading SB1050 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1053

Special Consent SB1053 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1181

Senate 3rd Reading SB1181 Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1211

Senate 3rd Reading SB1211 Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1224

Special Consent SB1224 Jones

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1266

Senate 3rd Reading SB1266 Stern

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1299

Special Consent SB1299 Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1302

Senate 3rd Reading SB1302 Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1330

Special Consent SB1330 Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1373

Senate 3rd Reading SB1373 Grove et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1393

Senate 3rd Reading SB1393 McGuire

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1395

Special Consent SB1395 Valladares

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1397

Special Consent SB1397 Alvarado-Gil

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1407

Special Consent SB1407 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1430

Special Consent SB1430 E. & C.A. (Wiener)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 94

Special Consent SR94 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 46

Assembly 3rd Reading AB46 Nguyen et al. By Blakespear

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1365

Senate 3rd Reading SB1365 Allen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 865

Senate 3rd Reading SB865 Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 866

Senate 3rd Reading SB866 Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 869

Senate 3rd Reading SB869 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 876

Senate 3rd Reading SB876 Padilla et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 895

Senate 3rd Reading SB895 Wiener et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 898

Senate 3rd Reading SB898 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 913

Senate 3rd Reading SB913 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 923

Senate 3rd Reading SB923 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 937

Senate 3rd Reading SB937 Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 938

Senate 3rd Reading SB938 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 948

Senate 3rd Reading SB948 Arreguín et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 954

Senate 3rd Reading SB954 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 966

Senate 3rd Reading SB966 Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 970

Senate 3rd Reading SB970 Cervantes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 989

Senate 3rd Reading SB989 Blakespear et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1007

Senate 3rd Reading SB1007 Menjivar et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 1009

Senate 3rd Reading SB1009 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1010

Senate 3rd Reading SB1010 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1021

Senate 3rd Reading SB1021 Choi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1031

Senate 3rd Reading SB1031 Blakespear