Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Melissa Hurtado

Melissa Hurtado

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 16

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 16 · 2022–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 14 · 2018–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

For voters in Senate District 16, Melissa Hurtado’s public path begins in local government, on the Sanger City Council, and reaches the California State Senate through two markedly different elections. In November 2018, she won her Senate seat by defeating incumbent Republican Andy Vidak. Four years later, running in the redrawn district, she survived by 22 votes. Between those campaigns came a place on Joe Biden’s National Latino Leadership Committee; afterward came a bid for Congress that ended in the primary. It is a career defined, in the available public record, less by a catalog of policy achievements than by the offices she sought and the narrow electoral ground she has had to hold.

FROM SANGER

Hurtado was born on March 6, 1988. The first public office identified in her career is the Sanger City Council.

That city post was her only listed elective office before the State Senate.

The record does not provide the dates of her City Council service or details about her work there.

WINNING THE SENATE SEAT

Hurtado was first elected to the California State Senate in November 2018. She defeated incumbent Republican Andy Vidak.

That result established the central fact of her first Senate campaign: she did not enter an open seat. She won it from an incumbent. The available account does not provide the vote totals or margin from that election, nor does it identify the issues on which the campaign turned.

Her rise, as documented, was direct: Sanger City Council, then the State Senate. There are no other offices listed between them.

A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ROLE

On July 7, 2020, Hurtado was selected to serve on the National Latino Leadership Committee of Joe Biden, who was then a presidential candidate.

The appointment placed a state senator with local-government roots on a named national campaign committee. No duties, policy portfolio or work product from the committee are specified. Nor does the account describe what role Hurtado played in the presidential campaign beyond her selection to the committee.

Still, the date and title matter in the chronology.

TWENTY-TWO VOTES

Hurtado ran for reelection in 2022 in the redrawn 16th Senate District. Before the vote, she was considered the most endangered incumbent at the state level in California.

Hurtado received 50.01% of the vote and won by a margin of 22 votes.

Her reelection was not a broad or comfortable ratification.

The redrawn district also meant that Hurtado was not simply repeating her 2018 campaign before an unchanged constituency. The facts provided do not identify how the district changed or which communities altered the electoral balance. They establish only that the district was redrawn, that Hurtado entered the contest as California’s most endangered state-level incumbent, and that she retained the seat by 22 votes.

The 2018 campaign took the seat from an incumbent. The 2022 campaign kept it under new district lines, but only just.

THE CONGRESSIONAL BID

In July 2023, Hurtado filed paperwork declaring her candidacy for California’s 22nd congressional district in the 2024 election.

It was an attempt to move from the state Legislature to Congress, though the account does not identify her campaign platform or the case she made for changing offices.

Hurtado placed fourth in the March 2024 primary. She did not advance to the general election.

The congressional campaign therefore did not produce another move up the ballot. Her public career remained centered on the Senate seat she had first won in 2018 and retained in 2022.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Hurtado’s documented record is clearest on electoral durability, not on a policy signature.

No legislation, Senate committee assignment, budget vote, regulatory action or sustained policy cause is identified here. Without those particulars, it would be speculation to say what Hurtado is most known for as a policymaker or to assign her a constituency of interest beyond the electorates attached to the offices she has held and sought.

What voters can see plainly is the political map of her career. It starts with Sanger, moves to the State Senate in 2018, passes through a national campaign appointment in 2020, narrows to a 22-vote reelection in 2022 and extends unsuccessfully toward Congress in 2024. Her defining public test has been keeping the Senate office she won from an incumbent—and doing so in a district where, in the last documented Senate election, almost every vote was needed.

The record

3,614 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2028

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2046

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Transportation]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2116

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2425

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2559

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2667

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Business, Professions and Economic Development]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2777

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2795

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1301

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1715

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1813

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2111

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2175

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2266

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2463

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2618

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 109

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 109

Assembly 3rd Reading AB109 Gabriel By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1549

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1549 Krell Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1583

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1583 Rogers

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1948

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1948 Ramos et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2286

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2286 Bryan

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2455

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2455 Haney et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2556

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2556 Boerner

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SJR 17

Senate 3rd Reading SJR17 Choi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2726

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2726 Fong

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 112

Senate 3rd Reading SR112 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 1

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR1 Quirk-Silva et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 94

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR94 Patel et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 119

Special Consent ACR119 Ta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 123

Special Consent ACR123 Chen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 124

Special Consent ACR124 Ta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 143

Special Consent ACR143 Pacheco et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 158

Special Consent ACR158 Solache et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 163

Special Consent ACR163 Ramos et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 167

Special Consent ACR167 Hadwick et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 174

Special Consent ACR174 Muratsuchi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 178

Special Consent ACR178 Flora et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 179

Special Consent ACR179 Flora et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 180

Special Consent ACR180 Connolly et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 181

Special Consent ACR181 Patel et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 182

Special Consent ACR182 Ransom et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 183

Special Consent ACR183 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 184

Special Consent ACR184 Rivas et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 186

Special Consent ACR186 Chen et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 188

Special Consent ACR188 Soria et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 189

Special Consent ACR189 Ahrens et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 190

Special Consent ACR190 Ortega et al. By Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 195

Special Consent ACR195 Gabriel et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 196

Special Consent ACR196 Solache et al