Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Leticia Castillo

Leticia Castillo

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 58

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

The record

4,558 events, each with its source
VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 102

AB 102 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 152

AB 152 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 103

AB 103 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 104

AB 104 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 105

AB 105 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 106

AB 106 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 107

AB 107 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 151

AB 151 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 108

AB 108 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 109

AB 109 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 110

AB 110 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 111

AB 111 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 112

AB 112 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 113

AB 113 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 114

AB 114 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 115

AB 115 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 116

AB 116 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 117

AB 117 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 118

AB 118 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 150

AB 150 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 119

AB 119 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 120

AB 120 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 121

AB 121 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 149

AB 149 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 122

AB 122 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 123

AB 123 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 148

AB 148 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 124

AB 124 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 125

AB 125 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 126

AB 126 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 127

AB 127 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 128

AB 128 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 129

AB 129 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 130

AB 130 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 147

AB 147 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 20

SCR 20 Ochoa Bogh Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 21

SCR 21 Smallwood-Cuevas Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 131

AB 131 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 132

AB 132 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 30

SCR 30 Smallwood-Cuevas Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 133

AB 133 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 134

AB 134 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 146

AB 146 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 135

AB 135 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 136

AB 136 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 137

AB 137 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 145

AB 145 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 144

AB 144 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 182

AB 182 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 183

AB 183 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading