Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Leticia Castillo

Leticia Castillo

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 58

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

The record

4,188 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1877

AB 1877 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1890

AB 1890 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1892

AB 1892 Davies Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1902

AB 1902 Pellerin Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1906

AB 1906 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1907

AB 1907 Addis Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1914

AB 1914 Schiavo Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1960

AB 1960 Bennett Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1925

AB 1925 Jeff Gonzalez Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1931

AB 1931 Papan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1932

AB 1932 Elhawary Third Reading Urgency

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1934

AB 1934 Bennett Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1947

AB 1947 Ta Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1954

AB 1954 Ward Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1959

AB 1959 Patel Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1961

AB 1961 Ahrens Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1965

AB 1965 Sharp-Collins Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1967

AB 1967 Zbur Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1969

AB 1969 Bonta Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1979

AB 1979 Bonta Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1983

AB 1983 Blanca Rubio Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1985

AB 1985 Irwin Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1988

AB 1988 Pellerin Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1991

AB 1991 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1996

AB 1996 Bonta Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2002

AB 2002 Solache Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2007

AB 2007 Bauer-Kahan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2008

AB 2008 Patel Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2010

AB 2010 Soria Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2022

AB 2022 Jeff Gonzalez Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2030

AB 2030 Lowenthal Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2031

AB 2031 Petrie-Norris Consent Calendar Second Day

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2039

AB 2039 Zbur Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2045

AB 2045 Connolly Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2046

AB 2046 Ransom Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2060

AB 2060 Muratsuchi Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2065

AB 2065 Petrie-Norris Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2066

AB 2066 Celeste Rodriguez Assembly Third Reading By BONTA

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2075

AB 2075 Bennett Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2076

AB 2076 Lowenthal Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2084

AB 2084 Bauer-Kahan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2093

AB 2093 Bauer-Kahan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2103

AB 2103 Irwin Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2104

AB 2104 Carrillo Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2110

AB 2110 Johnson Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2111

AB 2111 Papan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2124

AB 2124 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2141

AB 2141 Patterson Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2146

AB 2146 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2164

AB 2164 Bauer-Kahan Assembly Third Reading