Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Leticia Castillo

Leticia Castillo

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 58

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

The record

3,837 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1746

AB 1746 Davies Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1753

AB 1753 Stefani Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1754

AB 1754 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1755

AB 1755 Sharp-Collins Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1759

AB 1759 Elhawary Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1769

AB 1769 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1775

AB 1775 Ward Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1787

AB 1787 Schultz Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1789

AB 1789 Boerner Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1796

AB 1796 Jackson Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1810

AB 1810 Berman Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1812

AB 1812 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1815

AB 1815 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1818

AB 1818 Ortega Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1820

AB 1820 Schiavo Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1827

AB 1827 Chen Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1831

AB 1831 Ahrens Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1841

AB 1841 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1842

AB 1842 Harabedian Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1847

AB 1847 Harabedian Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1856

AB 1856 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1864

AB 1864 Berman Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1868

AB 1868 Gallagher Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1882

AB 1882 Ellis Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1889

AB 1889 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1891

AB 1891 Connolly Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1897

AB 1897 Haney Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1901

AB 1901 Berman Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1903

AB 1903 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1910

AB 1910 Boerner Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1927

AB 1927 Krell Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1933

AB 1933 Hoover Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1939

AB 1939 Flora Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1940

AB 1940 Calderon Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1946

AB 1946 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1949

AB 1949 Lee Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1957

AB 1957 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1964

AB 1964 Bennett Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1980

AB 1980 Caloza Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1990

AB 1990 Gipson Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1997

AB 1997 Lee Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2003

AB 2003 Berman Third Reading Urgency

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2006

AB 2006 Michelle Rodriguez Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2009

AB 2009 Chen Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2017

AB 2017 Haney Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2018

AB 2018 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2023

AB 2023 Wicks Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2024

AB 2024 Nguyen Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2032

AB 2032 Ransom Third Reading Urgency

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 2047

AB 2047 Bauer-Kahan Assembly Third Reading