Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Leticia Castillo

Leticia Castillo

Republican

State Assembly · Assembly District 58

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 58 · 2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Leticia Castillo entered the Assembly after an unsuccessful campaign in 2022. A first-generation Mexican American born in Riverside, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while attending the Corona College of Cosmetology in 1989. She holds degrees in human services, counseling psychology, and social and behavioral studies. Prior to her election, she worked as a psychotherapist in private practice. She won Assembly District 58 on her second attempt, taking an open seat by 596 votes. Her early legislative agenda has included parental rights, transgender issues, abortion and election identification.

ROOTS AND THE JOB

Castillo was born in Riverside on April 27, 1971. In 1989, she graduated from Lee Pollard High School while simultaneously attending the Corona College of Cosmetology. She holds an associate degree in social and behavioral studies from Riverside City College, a bachelor’s degree in human services from the University of Phoenix, and a master’s degree in counseling psychology from National University.

Prior to her election, Castillo was a psychotherapist in private practice. Her biography also includes Lee Pollard High School, the Corona College of Cosmetology and Riverside City College.

THE SECOND RUN

Castillo first ran for the California State Assembly in 2022. She placed third in the primary and did not reach the general election against incumbent Democrat Sabrina Cervantes. Two years later, she returned for the open race to succeed Sabrina Cervantes, who ran for the California State Senate.

The 2024 primary put Castillo against two Democratic members of the Riverside City Council, Clarissa Cervantes and Ronaldo Fierro. Castillo advanced, then defeated Clarissa Cervantes by 596 votes in the general election. Her victory was seen as a major upset in a blue-leaning district.

The outcome was attributed in part to a swing among Latino voters toward Donald Trump in the concurrent presidential election, as well as Clarissa Cervantes’ two arrests for driving under the influence. Castillo’s route to office included a second campaign, an open seat, two city councilmembers as primary opponents and a 596-vote general-election margin.

THE FIRST RECORD

In February 2025, Castillo introduced numerous anti-trans bills and promoted the parental rights movement. One proposal would state that a parent’s refusal to use a child’s preferred pronouns or chosen name, or a parent’s allowing a child to access gender-affirming health care, is not child abuse. It would also bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases.

Another bill would require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from public-school curricula, assemblies or lessons involving “transgender concepts” and receive an alternative educational activity. Castillo also introduced legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion. The anti-abortion California Family Council supported the bill.

In April 2025, she supported an unsuccessful voter ID law. The proposal would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote, government-issued identification at polling places, and the last four digits of a government identification number on absentee ballots.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Parental authority in disputes involving gender and schools is a recurring element of Castillo’s early legislative record. Her bills would bar judges from considering whether a parent is gender-affirming in child-custody cases, state that specified parental actions involving a child’s gender identity are not child abuse, and require students, with a parent’s permission, to be excused from school discussions of transgender concepts.

Her early record also includes legislation promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion, supported by the anti-abortion California Family Council. She additionally supported an unsuccessful voter ID proposal that would have imposed proof-of-citizenship and identification requirements on voter registration, polling-place voting and absentee ballots.

Taken together, Castillo’s early Assembly record includes parental-rights and transgender-related legislation, an adoption bill presented as an alternative to abortion, and support for stricter election-identification requirements. These actions followed her 596-vote victory in Assembly District 58.

The record

4,096 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1556

AB 1556 Haney Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1609

AB 1609 Zbur Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1603

AB 1603 Schultz Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1612

AB 1612 Alanis Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1613

AB 1613 Wilson Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1615

AB 1615 Nguyen Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1627

AB 1627 Ávila Farías Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1633

AB 1633 Haney Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1642

AB 1642 Harabedian Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1644

AB 1644 Muratsuchi Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1650

AB 1650 Caloza Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1655

AB 1655 Bryan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1666

AB 1666 Rogers Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1675

AB 1675 Lee Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1682

AB 1682 Hart Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1710

AB 1710 Carrillo Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1729

AB 1729 Lee Third Reading Urgency

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1732

AB 1732 Alvarez Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1740

AB 1740 Zbur Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1749

AB 1749 Dixon Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1761

AB 1761 Rogers Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1770

AB 1770 Garcia Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1772

AB 1772 Papan Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1776

AB 1776 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1798

AB 1798 Wilson Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1806

AB 1806 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1807

AB 1807 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1821

AB 1821 Pacheco Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1826

AB 1826 Lackey Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1830

AB 1830 Petrie-Norris Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1836

AB 1836 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1851

AB 1851 Gipson Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1854

AB 1854 Krell Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1859

AB 1859 Ortega Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1881

AB 1881 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1883

AB 1883 Bryan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1887

AB 1887 Zbur Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1896

AB 1896 Mark González Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1905

AB 1905 Schultz Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1915

AB 1915 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1919

AB 1919 Pellerin Third Reading Urgency

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1921

AB 1921 Ward Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1923

AB 1923 Soria Third Reading Urgency

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1924

AB 1924 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1929

AB 1929 Ortega Assembly Third Reading

VoteNay
Voted Nay on AB 1930

AB 1930 Zbur Assembly Third Reading

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2033

AB 2033 Papan Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1994

AB 1994 Alvarez Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2020

AB 2020 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2026

AB 2026 Aguiar-Curry Assembly Third Reading