Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Laura Richardson

Laura Richardson

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 35

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Laura Richardson’s public record is rooted in Long Beach, where she served on the City Council from 2000 to 2006 and worked on development, alleys and transportation for seniors. Her route from there moved quickly: one term in the California Assembly, a 2007 special election to Congress and two subsequent reelections. It also includes a 20-point congressional defeat, property defaults and a House reprimand after an ethics investigation. For Senate District 35 voters, Richardson is a politician with experience at three levels of government and a record that contains both municipal work and controversies involving her properties and conduct in federal office. Her career has included service in Long Beach city government, the California Assembly and Congress.

ROOTS AND HOME GROUND

Richardson was born in Los Angeles on April 14, 1962. Her parents divorced when she was two, and she was raised by a single mother. Her father, who was black, belonged to the Teamsters; her mother was white. Richardson has said racism directed at her mixed-race family influenced her desire, from a young age, to become a public servant.

She graduated from UCLA with a bachelor’s degree in political science in 1984. In 1987, she joined Xerox Corporation, where she worked for 14 years. She received an MBA from USC’s Marshall School of Business in 1996.

On the Long Beach City Council, Richardson won a second term outright on the first ballot in 2004. She established the Sixth District Master Plan for development, secured Long Beach’s first funding for alley maintenance and began planning a Senior Transportation Program in Central Long Beach. While serving on the council, she also spent five years as Southern California director for Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante.

THE JUMP

Richardson represented the 55th district in the California State Assembly during the 2007 term. Her stay was brief. On August 21, 2007, she won a special election for California’s 37th congressional district. Voters returned her to the House in 2008 and again in 2010.

Her congressional tenure included a vote for the FISA Amendments Act on June 20, 2008. She endorsed Hillary Clinton in that year’s Democratic presidential primary. In Sacramento, she had supported AB 900, legislation to create 40,000 additional prison beds in California.

The congressional map changed in 2012. Most of Richardson’s former territory became part of the 44th District, while her Long Beach home was drawn into the new 47th District. She moved into the 44th District, sought reelection against Representative Janice Hahn and lost on November 6, 2012, by 20 percentage points. It was the end of a rapid sequence that had taken Richardson from the Long Beach council to the Assembly and then to Congress within seven years.

THE HARD RECORD

Richardson’s time in higher office was accompanied by financial and ethics cases that became part of her public record. After her election to the Assembly, she bought a Sacramento home with no money down and a subprime mortgage. According to county records, she received a default notice and Notice of Trustee’s Sale in late 2007. Following the congressional special election, she stopped paying her mortgages; properties in Long Beach and San Pedro also went into default.

The Sacramento home was foreclosed while Richardson said she had a loan-modification agreement with her lender. She was accused of receiving preferential treatment when the bank rescinded the foreclosure, but the House Ethics Committee cleared her of wrongdoing in that matter. She also faced complaints over the maintenance of the Sacramento property.

A separate House Ethics Committee investigation concerned the improper use of congressional staff. The committee found that Richardson had broken federal law, violated House rules and obstructed its investigation. She was ordered to pay a $10,000 fine, and the full House voted to accept the committee’s report and reprimand her. Richardson claimed in 2011 that she had been singled out because of her race.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Richardson’s municipal policy record includes work she did in Long Beach. The Sixth District Master Plan provided a strategic guideline for development in the area. She secured the city’s first funding for alley maintenance and initiated planning for a Senior Transportation Program in Central Long Beach.

Her record at the state and federal levels includes support for a large expansion of California’s prison capacity and a vote for the FISA Amendments Act. Those votes sit alongside the neighborhood-scale work of her council years.

Documented interests in Richardson’s record include Long Beach development, municipal alley maintenance and transportation planning for seniors. Her career also includes a council plan, the first city funding for alley maintenance, a planning process and service in state and federal office. That record also includes her electoral defeat, property defaults and the House Ethics Committee findings that led to her reprimand.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 35 · 2024–present
  • State Senate · Senate District 35 · 2006–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Laura Richardson’s public record is rooted in Long Beach, where she served on the City Council from 2000 to 2006 and worked on development, alleys and transportation for seniors. Her route from there moved quickly: one term in the California Assembly, a 2007 special election to Congress and two subsequent reelections. It also includes a 20-point congressional defeat, property defaults and a House reprimand after an ethics investigation. For Senate District 35 voters, Richardson is a politician with experience at three levels of government and a record that contains both municipal work and controversies involving her properties and conduct in federal office. Her career has included service in Long Beach city government, the California Assembly and Congress.

ROOTS AND HOME GROUND

Richardson was born in Los Angeles on April 14, 1962. Her parents divorced when she was two, and she was raised by a single mother. Her father, who was black, belonged to the Teamsters; her mother was white. Richardson has said racism directed at her mixed-race family influenced her desire, from a young age, to become a public servant.

She graduated from UCLA with a bachelor’s degree in political science in 1984. In 1987, she joined Xerox Corporation, where she worked for 14 years. She received an MBA from USC’s Marshall School of Business in 1996.

On the Long Beach City Council, Richardson won a second term outright on the first ballot in 2004. She established the Sixth District Master Plan for development, secured Long Beach’s first funding for alley maintenance and began planning a Senior Transportation Program in Central Long Beach. While serving on the council, she also spent five years as Southern California director for Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante.

THE JUMP

Richardson represented the 55th district in the California State Assembly during the 2007 term. Her stay was brief. On August 21, 2007, she won a special election for California’s 37th congressional district. Voters returned her to the House in 2008 and again in 2010.

Her congressional tenure included a vote for the FISA Amendments Act on June 20, 2008. She endorsed Hillary Clinton in that year’s Democratic presidential primary. In Sacramento, she had supported AB 900, legislation to create 40,000 additional prison beds in California.

The congressional map changed in 2012. Most of Richardson’s former territory became part of the 44th District, while her Long Beach home was drawn into the new 47th District. She moved into the 44th District, sought reelection against Representative Janice Hahn and lost on November 6, 2012, by 20 percentage points. It was the end of a rapid sequence that had taken Richardson from the Long Beach council to the Assembly and then to Congress within seven years.

THE HARD RECORD

Richardson’s time in higher office was accompanied by financial and ethics cases that became part of her public record. After her election to the Assembly, she bought a Sacramento home with no money down and a subprime mortgage. According to county records, she received a default notice and Notice of Trustee’s Sale in late 2007. Following the congressional special election, she stopped paying her mortgages; properties in Long Beach and San Pedro also went into default.

The Sacramento home was foreclosed while Richardson said she had a loan-modification agreement with her lender. She was accused of receiving preferential treatment when the bank rescinded the foreclosure, but the House Ethics Committee cleared her of wrongdoing in that matter. She also faced complaints over the maintenance of the Sacramento property.

A separate House Ethics Committee investigation concerned the improper use of congressional staff. The committee found that Richardson had broken federal law, violated House rules and obstructed its investigation. She was ordered to pay a $10,000 fine, and the full House voted to accept the committee’s report and reprimand her. Richardson claimed in 2011 that she had been singled out because of her race.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Richardson’s municipal policy record includes work she did in Long Beach. The Sixth District Master Plan provided a strategic guideline for development in the area. She secured the city’s first funding for alley maintenance and initiated planning for a Senior Transportation Program in Central Long Beach.

Her record at the state and federal levels includes support for a large expansion of California’s prison capacity and a vote for the FISA Amendments Act. Those votes sit alongside the neighborhood-scale work of her council years.

Documented interests in Richardson’s record include Long Beach development, municipal alley maintenance and transportation planning for seniors. Her career also includes a council plan, the first city funding for alley maintenance, a planning process and service in state and federal office. That record also includes her electoral defeat, property defaults and the House Ethics Committee findings that led to her reprimand.

The record

6,819 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2596

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2596 Gipson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2619

Placed on suspense file

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2639

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2685

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2685 AGRI. (Soria)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2700

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2728

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2728 Soria

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2778

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2778 AGRI. (Soria)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2786

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2786 ELECTIONS (Pellerin)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2794

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2794 HIGHER ED. (Fong)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 575

Unfinished Business SB575 Laird Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 922

Unfinished Business SB922 Laird et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 992

Unfinished Business SB992 Niello Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 121

Senate 3rd Reading SR121 Alvarado-Gil et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 122

Senate 3rd Reading SR122 Valladares et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 124

Senate 3rd Reading SR124 Weber Pierson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 125

Senate 3rd Reading SR125 Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 180

Consent Calendar 2nd SCR180 Valladares et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 192

Senate 3rd Reading SCR192 Stern et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCA 5

Senate 3rd Reading SCA5 Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1923

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1923 Soria et al. By Caballero Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 149

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR149 Hart et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 157

Special Consent ACR157 Hoover et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 187

Special Consent ACR187 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 194

Special Consent ACR194 Pacheco et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 214

Special Consent ACR214 Bryan et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 219

Special Consent ACR219 Papan et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 220

Special Consent ACR220 Nguyen

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 222

Special Consent ACR222 Michelle Rodriguez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 223

Special Consent ACR223 Rogers

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 224

Special Consent ACR224 Dixon et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 109

Special Consent SR109 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 118

Special Consent SR118 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 119

Senate 3rd Reading SR119 Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 126

Senate 3rd Reading SR126 Rubio

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 89

Unfinished Business SCR89 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 182

Special Consent SCR182 Seyarto et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 186

Senate 3rd Reading SCR186 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2055

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2059

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2074

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2076

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2084

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2093

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2101

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2103

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2104

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2108

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2111

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2115

Placed on suspense file

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2116

Placed on suspense file