
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,084 events, each with its sourceAB 1258 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1322 Agriculture Concurrence in Senate Amendments By SORIA
AB 1339 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1369 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1408 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
SB 72 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Soria
SB 76 Seyarto Senate Third Reading By Chen
SB 246 Grove Senate Third Reading By Hadwick
SB 250 Ochoa Bogh Senate Third Reading By Chen
SB 456 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Jackson
SB 484 Laird Senate Third Reading By Haney
SB 512 Pérez Senate Third Reading By Wicks
SB 576 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Lowenthal
SB 680 Rubio Senate Third Reading By Krell
SB 694 Archuleta Senate Third Reading By Schiavo
SB 695 Cortese Senate Third Reading By Soria
SB 783 Rubio Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
SB 785 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Elhawary
SB 788 Niello Senate Third Reading By Krell
SB 831 Limón Senate Third Reading By Muratsuchi
SB 863 Revenue and Taxation Senate Third Reading By GIPSON
AJR 5 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
SJR 1 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Zbur
AB 59 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 87 Boerner Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 238 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 391 Michelle Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 414 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 420 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 482 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 516 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 571 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 574 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 583 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 652 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 696 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1008 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1150 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1154 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1523 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
SB 31 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Alvarez
SB 62 Menjivar Senate Third Reading By Bonta
SB 40 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Bains
SB 92 Blakespear Senate Third Reading By Ward
SB 221 Ochoa Bogh Senate Third Reading
SB 230 Laird Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 358 Becker Senate Third Reading By Ward
SB 362 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
SB 439 Weber Pierson Senate Third Reading By Flora
SB 489 Arreguín Senate Third Reading By Alvarez