
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,084 events, each with its sourceAB 248 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 251 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 310 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 321 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 339 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 343 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 352 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 365 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 399 Boerner Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 435 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 489 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 509 Flora Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 542 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments By LOWENTHAL
AB 519 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 592 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 645 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 769 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 759 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 774 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 806 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 830 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 848 Soria Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 893 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 931 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 987 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1002 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1021 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1061 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1067 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1076 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1314 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1344 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1374 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1415 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
SB 236 Weber Pierson Senate Third Reading By Elhawary
SB 3 Cervantes Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 5 Cabaldon Senate Third Reading By Wilson
SB 20 Menjivar Senate Third Reading By Celeste Rodriguez
SB 21 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Mark González
SB 54 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Schiavo
SB 39 Weber Pierson Third Reading Urgency By Irwin
SB 50 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Bonta
SB 68 Menjivar Senate Third Reading By Elhawary
SB 78 Seyarto Senate Third Reading By Lackey
SB 82 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Connolly
SB 86 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Wilson
SB 233 Seyarto Senate Third Reading By Alanis
SB 241 Cervantes Senate Third Reading By Fong
SB 253 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Kalra
SB 261 Wahab Senate Third Reading By Kalra