
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,084 events, each with its sourceSB 825 Limón Senate Third Reading By Schiavo
AB 5 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 15 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 55 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 57 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 60 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 62 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 255 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 316 Krell Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 320 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 341 Arambula Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 367 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 368 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 393 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 411 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 440 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 449 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 506 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 546 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 560 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 671 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 677 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 754 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 772 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments By ORTEGA
AB 797 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 828 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 836 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 867 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 890 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 899 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 930 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 953 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1041 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1103 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1075 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1123 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1239 Dixon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1269 Bryan Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 1296 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1303 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1312 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1318 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1326 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1340 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1348 Bains Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1384 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
SB 19 Rubio Senate Third Reading By Patel
SB 30 Cortese Senate Third Reading By Wilson
SB 36 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Krell
SB 41 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Bonta