
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,084 events, each with its sourceAB 1167 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1197 Calderon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1224 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1249 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1250 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1261 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1275 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1280 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1308 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1329 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1370 Patterson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1378 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1410 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1411 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1414 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1423 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1455 Bryan Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 1501 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1502 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1503 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1504 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1511 Elections Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PELLERIN
AB 1513 Elections Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PELLERIN
AB 1514 L. & E. Concurrence in Senate Amendments By ORTEGA
AB 1520 W., P. & W. Concurrence in Senate Amendments By PAPAN
AB 1521 Judiciary Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
AB 1525 JUD. Concurrence in Senate Amendments By KALRA
AB 1531 Emergency Management Concurrence in Senate Amendments By RANSOM
AB 1532 Communications and Conve Concurrence - Urgency Added By BOERNER
SB 47 Umberg Third Reading Urgency By Kalra
SB 83 Umberg Senate Third Reading By Petrie-Norris
SB 243 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Kalra
SB 292 Cervantes Senate Third Reading By Harabedian
SB 302 Padilla Senate Third Reading By Petrie-Norris
SB 313 Cervantes Senate Third Reading By Bonta
SB 361 Becker Senate Third Reading By Wicks
SB 376 Valladares Senate Third Reading By Quirk-Silva
SB 418 Menjivar Third Reading Urgency By Bonta
SB 450 Menjivar Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 472 Stern Senate Third Reading By Lowenthal
SB 500 Stern Senate Third Reading By Petrie-Norris
SB 509 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Bains
SB 578 Smallwood-Cuevas Senate Third Reading By Kalra
SB 630 Allen Senate Third Reading By Pellerin
SB 683 Cortese Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 709 Menjivar Senate Third Reading By Schultz
SB 766 Allen Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 771 Stern Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
SB 777 Richardson Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 820 Stern Senate Third Reading By Schultz