
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,084 events, each with its sourceAB 263 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 288 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 289 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 374 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 382 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 432 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 450 Carrillo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 461 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 474 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 483 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 512 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 515 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 518 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 524 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 527 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 543 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 554 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 561 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 563 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 573 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 606 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 640 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 621 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 648 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 656 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 679 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 682 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 742 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 723 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 727 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 737 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 749 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 752 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 753 Garcia Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 786 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 812 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 818 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 827 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 843 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 845 Arambula Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 898 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 935 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 992 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1028 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1037 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1074 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1094 Bains Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1096 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1104 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1125 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments