
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,084 events, each with its sourceSB 763 Hurtado Senate Third Reading By Kalra
SB 767 Richardson Senate Third Reading By Petrie-Norris
SB 775 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 776 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Berman
SB 787 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Petrie-Norris
SB 809 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Ramos
SB 822 Becker Senate Third Reading By Valencia
SB 848 Pérez Senate Third Reading By Wicks
SB 855 Military and Veterans Aff Senate Third Reading By SCHIAVO
AB 39 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 70 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 93 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 243 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 247 Bryan Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 268 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 338 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 406 Schiavo Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 419 Connolly Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 422 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 495 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 507 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 564 Haney Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 566 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 610 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 628 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 632 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 650 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 678 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 692 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 740 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 747 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 766 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in
AB 777 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 798 Calderon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in
AB 851 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 858 Lee Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 961 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1050 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1064 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1069 Bains Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1078 Berman Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1136 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1172 Nguyen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1319 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1324 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1332 Ahrens Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1336 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1362 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments