
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
3,986 events, each with its sourceSB 646 Weber Pierson Senate Third Reading By Papan
SB 707 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
SB 727 McGuire Senate Third Reading By Rogers
SB 733 Wahab Senate Third Reading By Schultz
SB 839 Laird Senate Third Reading By Connolly
SB 840 Limón Third Reading Urgency By IRWIN
SB 851 Cervantes Senate Second Reading By Pellerin
SB 861 Business, Professions and Senate Third Reading By FLORA
ACR 107 Bauer-Kahan Consent Calendar Second Day
AB 7 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 56 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 91 Harabedian Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 144 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By GABRIEL
AB 149 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By GABRIEL
AB 154 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By GABRIEL
AB 245 Gipson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 253 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 265 Caloza Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 290 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 301 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 325 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 357 Alvarez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 394 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 400 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 445 Aguiar-Curry Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 451 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 460 Chen Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 462 Lowenthal Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 468 Gabriel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 476 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 478 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 531 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 562 Solache Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 587 Davies Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 607 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 630 Mark González Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 670 Quirk-Silva Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 726 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 770 Mark González Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 779 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 799 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 831 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 841 Patel Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 849 Soria Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 853 Wicks Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 896 Elhawary Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 969 Celeste Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 978 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 979 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 986 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments