
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,119 events, each with its sourceRelative to National Human Trafficking Awareness Month.
AB 8 AGUIAR-CURRY Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 16 Alanis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 45 Bauer-Kahan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 226 CALDERON Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 299 GABRIEL Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 349 Dixon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 366 PETRIE-NORRIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 378 Valencia Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 383 Davies Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 484 Dixon Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 486 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 572 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 596 ORTEGA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 653 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 695 Fong Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 699 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 715 ZBUR Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 720 Rogers Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 732 MACEDO Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 741 Ransom Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 764 Jeff Gonzalez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 789 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 808 Addis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 825 PETRIE-NORRIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 847 Sharp-Collins Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 870 Hadwick Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 889 Hadwick Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 915 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 940 WICKS Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 943 Michelle Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 959 Hadwick Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 962 Hoover Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 963 Petrie-Norris Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 975 Gallagher Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 985 Schiavo Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 1036 Schultz Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1043 WICKS Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1071 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1079 Ávila Farías Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1084 Zbur Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1098 Fong Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1108 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1127 GABRIEL Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1143 Bennett Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1152 Patterson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1178 PACHECO Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1207 IRWIN Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 1210 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1231 ELHAWARY Concurrence in Senate Amendments