
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
- State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · 2022–present
Greg Wallis arrived before District 47 voters through a contest that remained unsettled with each new count. In 2022, he and Democratic candidate Christy Holstege repeatedly exchanged leads in the newly redrawn district. By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. Wallis had come to that race after working for Assemblymember Chad Mayes, first becoming Mayes’ district director in 2014. On the documented record, the narrow election and the rematch that followed have defined his public career more clearly than any policy fight.
THE JOB BEFORE THE JOB
Born May 15, 1990, Wallis studied political science at California Lutheran University. His early professional record moved among communications, taxpayer advocacy and legislative work. He worked as an account executive for Mann Communications and served as executive director of the Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association.
In 2014, Wallis became district director for Assemblymember Chad Mayes. The position placed him in an elected official’s district operation eight years before his 2022 candidacy. The record does not identify particular legislation, constituent matters or campaigns that Wallis handled in that role, but the job is the central institutional fact documented about his career before his own election.
That connection also figured directly in the timing of his candidacy. Wallis announced his campaign in February 2022, after Mayes declined to seek reelection. He entered the race for the newly redrawn district after Mayes’ decision.
TWO CLOSE RACES
Wallis finished second in the 2022 primary, trailing Holstege, and advanced to face her in the general election. Holstege led in the initial returns. As additional votes were counted, the candidates traded the lead, leaving the district without a settled result until December.
By December 12, Holstege had lost by 85 votes and conceded. That margin was not the end of their contest. In April 2023, Holstege announced that she would run against Wallis again.
The order changed in the next primary: Wallis placed first, ahead of Holstege. Their general-election rematch ended with Wallis winning 51% to 49%. His documented electoral history is therefore concentrated in a single rivalry: two primaries, two general elections and two victories over the same opponent, first by 85 votes and then by a two-percentage-point margin.
THE POLICY RECORD
Wallis’ documented career supplies a clear map of how he reached office, but not a comparable map of how he has used it. His experience includes communications work, service as executive director of a taxpayer organization and work as a district director. Those are the identifiable professional and institutional connections in the record.
No specific bills, committee assignments, appointments, budget actions, causes or votes are identified. That leaves no documented basis for naming a policy signature or describing a particular constituency as the beneficiary of his work in office. The Inland Empire Taxpayer’s Association is the only named advocacy organization in his professional history, but no particular position or legislative action is attached to that service.
For District 47 voters, the established record is thus electoral and administrative rather than legislative: an Assembly staff position beginning in 2014, a candidacy after Mayes declined to seek reelection, an 85-vote victory in the newly redrawn district and a 51%-to-49% win in the rematch.
The record
4,027 events, each with its sourceAB 1562 Jackson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1647 Bryan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1656 Davies Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1660 Schiavo Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1875 Hart Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1892 Davies Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1908 McKinnor Concurrence - Urgency Added
AB 1910 Boerner Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1954 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1957 Pacheco Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 1977 Irwin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2001 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2052 Stefani Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2107 Pellerin Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2180 Ward Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2263 Kalra Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2346 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2595 Papan Concurrence in Senate Amendments
AB 2624 Bonta Concurrence in Senate Amendments
HR 86 Ta Consent Calendar Second Day
HR 130 Jackson Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
HR 135 Celeste Rodriguez Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
HR 138 Aguiar-Curry Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
AJR 9 Wallis Concurrence in Senate Amendments
SB 296 Archuleta Senate Third Reading By Schiavo
SB 401 Hurtado Senate Third Reading By Irwin
SB 479 Arreguín Senate Third Reading By Wicks
SB 599 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Ward
SB 692 Arreguín Senate Third Reading By Mark González
SB 872 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Harabedian
SB 925 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Calderon
SB 932 Hurtado Senate Third Reading By Papan
SB 934 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Ward
SB 945 Weber Pierson Senate Third Reading By Alanis
SB 977 Weber Pierson Senate Third Reading By Schiavo
SB 990 Grove Senate Third Reading By Ellis
SB 1030 Smallwood-Cuevas Senate Third Reading By Sharp-Collins
SB 1056 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Schultz
SB 1069 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Wilson
SB 1135 Blakespear Senate Third Reading By Rogers
SB 1149 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Wicks
SB 1154 Reyes Senate Third Reading By Schultz
SB 1192 Rubio Senate Third Reading By Stefani
SB 1194 Caballero Senate Third Reading By Bonta
SB 1263 McGuire Senate Third Reading By Rogers
SB 1264 Valladares Senate Third Reading By Dixon
SB 1354 Archuleta Senate Third Reading By Schiavo
SB 1371 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Harabedian
SB 1400 Arreguín Senate Third Reading By Ortega
SCR 129 Cortese Senate Third Reading By Calderon