Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,228 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 202

Senate 3rd Reading SB202 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 203

Senate 3rd Reading SB203 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 24

Senate 3rd Reading SR24 Wahab et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 204

Senate 3rd Reading SB204 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 26

Senate 3rd Reading SR26 Padilla et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 205

Senate 3rd Reading SB205 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 215

Senate 3rd Reading SB215 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 214

Senate 3rd Reading SB214 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 213

Senate 3rd Reading SB213 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 212

Senate 3rd Reading SB212 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 206

Senate 3rd Reading SB206 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 207

Senate 3rd Reading SB207 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 211

Senate 3rd Reading SB211 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 210

Senate 3rd Reading SB210 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 209

Senate 3rd Reading SB209 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 146

Senate 3rd Reading SB146 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 38

Senate 3rd Reading SCR38 Grove et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 35

Senate 3rd Reading SCR35 Grayson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 111

Senate 3rd Reading SB111 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 49

Senate 3rd Reading SB49 Grove et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 31

Senate 3rd Reading SCR31 Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 29

Senate 3rd Reading SCR29 McNerney

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 37

Senate 3rd Reading SCR37 Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 22

Special Consent ACR22 Muratsuchi et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 28

Senate 3rd Reading SR28 Hurtado et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 29

Special Consent ACR29 Irwin et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 27

Special Consent ACR27 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 26

Senate 3rd Reading SB26 Umberg et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 33

Special Consent ACR33 Zbur et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 26

Special Consent ACR26 Bonta et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 17

Special Consent ACR17 Hadwick et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 23

Senate 3rd Reading SR23 Rubio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 19

Special Consent ACR19 Macedo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 20

Special Consent ACR20 Macedo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 25

Senate 3rd Reading SR25 Limón

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 26

Senate 3rd Reading SCR26 Weber Pierson By Senator Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 19

Senate 3rd Reading SR19 Wahab et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 30

Senate 3rd Reading SCR30 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 27

Senate 3rd Reading SCR27 Choi

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 7

Senate 3rd Reading SCR7 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 17

Senate 3rd Reading SR17 Rubio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 18

Senate 3rd Reading SR18 Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 19

Senate 3rd Reading SCR19 Wahab et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 20

Senate 3rd Reading SCR20 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 15

Senate 3rd Reading SR15 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 21

Senate 3rd Reading SCR21 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 16

Senate 3rd Reading SR16 Caballero et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 17

Senate 3rd Reading SCR17 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 16

Senate 3rd Reading SCR16 Alvarado-Gil

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 11

Special Consent ACR11 Ahrens et al