Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,348 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 374

Consent Calendar 2nd SB374 Archuleta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 733

Consent Calendar 2nd SB733 Wahab

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 60

Senate 3rd Reading SCR60 Cortese

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 52

Senate 3rd Reading SCR52 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 619

Consent Calendar 2nd SB619 ED. (Pérez)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 48

Senate 3rd Reading SCR48 Cervantes et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 45

Senate 3rd Reading SCR45 Wahab et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 413

Consent Calendar 2nd SB413 Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 34

Senate 3rd Reading SCR34 Grove et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 583

Consent Calendar 2nd SB583 Rubio

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 37

Senate 3rd Reading SR37 Gonzalez et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 251

Senate 3rd Reading SB251 Caballero Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 671

Consent Calendar 2nd SB671 Cervantes

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 6

Special Consent ACR6 Ta et al. By Cortese

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 533

Consent Calendar 2nd SB533 Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 55

Special Consent ACR55 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 53

Special Consent ACR53 Bonta et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 35

Special Consent ACR35 Papan et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 39

Special Consent ACR39 Ramos et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 41

Special Consent ACR41 Patterson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 50

Special Consent ACR50 Ahrens et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 49

Special Consent ACR49 DeMaio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 48

Special Consent ACR48 DeMaio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 792

Consent Calendar 2nd SB792 Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 361

Consent Calendar 2nd SB361 Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 61

Consent Calendar 2nd SB61 Cortese

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 43

Senate 3rd Reading SCR43 Archuleta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 42

Senate 3rd Reading SCR42 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 54

Senate 3rd Reading SCR54 Grayson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 35

Senate 3rd Reading SR35 Gonzalez et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 47

Senate 3rd Reading SCR47 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 59

Senate 3rd Reading SCR59 Allen et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 33

Senate 3rd Reading SR33 Pérez et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 736

Consent Calendar 2nd SB736 L. GOV. (Durazo) Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 737

Consent Calendar 2nd SB737 L. GOV. (Durazo)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 100

Assembly 3rd Reading AB100 Gabriel By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 57

Senate 3rd Reading SCR57 Reyes et al. By Limón

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 512

Consent Calendar 2nd SB512 McGuire

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 233

Consent Calendar 2nd SB233 Seyarto et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 66

Consent Calendar 2nd SB66 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 735

Consent Calendar 2nd SB735 L. GOV. (Durazo) Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 25

Senate 3rd Reading SCR25 Blakespear et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 49

Senate 3rd Reading SCR49 Wahab

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SJR 2

Senate 3rd Reading SJR2 Cortese et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 34

Senate 3rd Reading SR34 Choi et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 51

Special Consent ACR51 Haney et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 28

Special Consent ACR28 Ortega et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 43

Special Consent ACR43 Pacheco et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 46

Special Consent ACR46 Soria et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 47

Special Consent ACR47 Chen et al