Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,348 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 283

Senate 3rd Reading SB283 Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 281

Senate 3rd Reading SB281 Pérez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 748

Senate 3rd Reading SB748 Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 76

Senate 3rd Reading SCR76 Valladares et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 66

Senate 3rd Reading SCR66 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 770

Senate 3rd Reading SB770 Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 363

Senate 3rd Reading SB363 Wiener et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 92

Senate 3rd Reading SB92 Blakespear et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 617

Senate 3rd Reading SB617 Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 750

Senate 3rd Reading SB750 Cortese et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 484

Senate 3rd Reading SB484 Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 624

Senate 3rd Reading SB624 Caballero et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 782

Senate 3rd Reading SB782 Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 631

Senate 3rd Reading SB631 Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 808

Senate 3rd Reading SB808 Caballero

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 360

Senate 3rd Reading SB360 Rubio

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 263

Senate 3rd Reading SB263 Gonzalez et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 640

Senate 3rd Reading SB640 Cabaldon et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 646

Senate 3rd Reading SB646 Weber Pierson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 259

Senate 3rd Reading SB259 Wahab

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 337

Senate 3rd Reading SB337 Menjivar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 812

Senate 3rd Reading SB812 Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 765

Senate 3rd Reading SB765 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 757

Senate 3rd Reading SB757 Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 754

Senate 3rd Reading SB754 Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 753

Senate 3rd Reading SB753 Cortese

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 741

Senate 3rd Reading SB741 Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 491

Senate 3rd Reading SB491 Laird et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 543

Senate 3rd Reading SB543 McNerney

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 390

Senate 3rd Reading SB390 Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 486

Senate 3rd Reading SB486 Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 346

Senate 3rd Reading SB346 Durazo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 394

Senate 3rd Reading SB394 Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 340

Senate 3rd Reading SB340 Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 395

Senate 3rd Reading SB395 Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 480

Senate 3rd Reading SB480 Archuleta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 324

Senate 3rd Reading SB324 Menjivar et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 510

Senate 3rd Reading SB510 Richardson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 489

Senate 3rd Reading SB489 Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 611

Senate 3rd Reading SB611 Richardson Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 276

Senate 3rd Reading SB276 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 50

Senate 3rd Reading SCR50 Stern

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 33

Senate 3rd Reading SCR33 Padilla et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 508

Senate 3rd Reading SB508 Valladares et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 42

Senate 3rd Reading SR42 Choi et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 36

Senate 3rd Reading SR36 Cortese et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 8

Senate 3rd Reading SB8 Ashby et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 371

Senate 3rd Reading SB371 Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 21

Senate 3rd Reading SB21 Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 27

Senate 3rd Reading SB27 Umberg Urgency Clause