Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,166 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 369

Senate 3rd Reading SB369 Padilla

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 362

Senate 3rd Reading SB362 Grayson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 25

Senate 3rd Reading SB25 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 24

Senate 3rd Reading SB24 McNerney

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 22

Senate 3rd Reading SB22 Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 358

Senate 3rd Reading SB358 Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 20

Senate 3rd Reading SB20 Menjivar et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 19

Senate 3rd Reading SB19 Rubio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 11

Senate 3rd Reading SB11 Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 75

Senate 3rd Reading SB75 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 7

Senate 3rd Reading SB7 McNerney et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 5

Senate 3rd Reading SB5 Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 4

Senate 3rd Reading SB4 Cervantes et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 332

Senate 3rd Reading SB332 Wahab

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 848

Senate 3rd Reading SB848 Pérez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 787

Senate 3rd Reading SB787 McNerney

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 790

Senate 3rd Reading SB790 Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 63

Senate 3rd Reading SB63 Wiener et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 323

Senate 3rd Reading SB323 Pérez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 313

Senate 3rd Reading SB313 Cervantes et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 59

Senate 3rd Reading SB59 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 804

Senate 3rd Reading SB804 Archuleta et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 452

Special Consent SB452 Weber Pierson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 450

Senate 3rd Reading SB450 Menjivar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 447

Special Consent SB447 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 444

Special Consent SB444 Hurtado

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 364

Special Consent SB364 Strickland

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 317

Special Consent SB317 Hurtado et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 359

Special Consent SB359 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 56

Special Consent SB56 Seyarto et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 428

Special Consent SB428 Laird et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 338

Special Consent SB338 Becker et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 333

Senate 3rd Reading SB333 Laird et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 862

Special Consent SB862 HEALTH (Menjivar)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 67

Special Consent SB67 Seyarto et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 568

Special Consent SB568 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 78

Special Consent SB78 Seyarto et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 54

Special Consent SB54 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 809

Senate 3rd Reading SB809 Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 328

Senate 3rd Reading SB328 Grayson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 615

Senate 3rd Reading SB615 Allen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 408

Special Consent SB408 Choi et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 304

Special Consent SB304 Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 563

Special Consent SB563 Valladares

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 822

Special Consent SB822 Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 745

Special Consent SB745 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 302

Special Consent SB302 Padilla et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 744

Special Consent SB744 Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 404

Senate 3rd Reading SB404 Caballero et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 739

Special Consent SB739 Arreguín