Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,285 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 36

Special Consent ACR36 Carrillo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 88

Special Consent ACR88 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 45

Special Consent ACR45 Quirk-Silva et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 58

Special Consent ACR58 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 62

Special Consent ACR62 Hart et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 15

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR15 Alanis et al. By Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 63

Special Consent ACR63 Tangipa et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 65

Special Consent ACR65 Ward et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 66

Special Consent ACR66 Dixon et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 68

Special Consent ACR68 Ávila Farías et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SJR 1

Senate 3rd Reading SJR1 Wiener et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 83

Senate 3rd Reading SCR83 Stern et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 75

Senate 3rd Reading SCR75 Weber Pierson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 86

Senate 3rd Reading SCR86 Weber Pierson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 74

Senate 3rd Reading SCR74 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AJR 11

Consent Calendar 2nd AJR11 Ransom et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 101

Unfinished Business SB101 Wiener Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 37

Senate 3rd Reading SB37 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 471

Special Consent SB471 Menjivar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 675

Senate 3rd Reading SB675 Padilla

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 254

Senate 3rd Reading SB254 Becker et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 800

Special Consent SB800 Reyes et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 761

Special Consent SB761 Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 763

Senate 3rd Reading SB763 Hurtado

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 771

Senate 3rd Reading SB771 Stern

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 331

Senate 3rd Reading SB331 Menjivar

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 380

Special Consent SB380 Jones Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 775

Special Consent SB775 Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 661

Senate 3rd Reading SB661 Hurtado

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 29

Senate 3rd Reading SB29 Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 244

Special Consent SB244 Grayson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 655

Senate 3rd Reading SB655 Stern

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 403

Senate 3rd Reading SB403 Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 834

Senate 3rd Reading SB834 Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 776

Special Consent SB776 Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 777

Senate 3rd Reading SB777 Richardson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 645

Senate 3rd Reading SB645 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 453

Senate 3rd Reading SB453 Stern

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 835

Senate 3rd Reading SB835 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 271

Special Consent SB271 Reyes

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 638

Senate 3rd Reading SB638 Padilla et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 483

Senate 3rd Reading SB483 Stern

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 498

Senate 3rd Reading SB498 Becker

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 633

Senate 3rd Reading SB633 Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 632

Senate 3rd Reading SB632 Arreguín

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 526

Senate 3rd Reading SB526 Menjivar et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 354

Senate 3rd Reading SB354 Limón

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 536

Senate 3rd Reading SB536 Archuleta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 540

Senate 3rd Reading SB540 Becker et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 540

Senate 3rd Reading SB540 Becker et al. Reconsider