Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,285 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 88

Special Consent SCR88 Seyarto et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 47

Special Consent SR47 Stern et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 655

Consent Calendar 2nd AB655 Alvarez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 102

Assembly 3rd Reading AB102 Gabriel By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 143

Assembly 3rd Reading AB143 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 103

Unfinished Business SB103 Wiener Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 741

Consent Calendar 2nd AB741 Ransom

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 116

Assembly 3rd Reading AB116 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 123

Assembly 3rd Reading AB123 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 120

Unfinished Business SB120 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 91

Special Consent ACR91 Aguiar-Curry et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 21

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR21 Flora

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 124

Unfinished Business SB124 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 118

Assembly 3rd Reading AB118 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 132

Unfinished Business SB132 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 16

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR16 Gallagher

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 127

Unfinished Business SB127 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 128

Unfinished Business SB128 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 313

Consent Calendar 2nd AB313 Ortega et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 233

Consent Calendar 2nd AB233 Gipson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 79

Consent Calendar 2nd SCR79 McGuire

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 37

Consent Calendar 2nd ACR37 Wallis et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 77

Special Consent SCR77 Seyarto et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 751

Consent Calendar 2nd AB751 Gipson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 354

Consent Calendar 2nd AB354 Michelle Rodriguez Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1297

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1297 Stefani

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 771

Consent Calendar 2nd AB771 Macedo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 49

Senate 3rd Reading SR49 Choi et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 565

Consent Calendar 2nd AB565 Dixon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 48

Senate 3rd Reading SR48 Menjivar et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 73

Senate 3rd Reading SCR73 Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 369

Consent Calendar 2nd AB369 Michelle Rodriguez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 67

Special Consent ACR67 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 69

Special Consent ACR69 Berman et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 23

Special Consent ACR23 Quirk-Silva et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 73

Special Consent ACR73 Stefani et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 74

Special Consent ACR74 Wilson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 24

Special Consent ACR24 Alanis et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 76

Special Consent ACR76 Solache et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 78

Special Consent ACR78 Patel et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 80

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR80 Stefani By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 82

Special Consent ACR82 Bryan et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 84

Special Consent ACR84 Hoover et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 85

Special Consent ACR85 Garcia et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 86

Special Consent ACR86 Rivas et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 87

Special Consent ACR87 Nguyen et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 94

Senate 3rd Reading SCR94 Blakespear et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 89

Special Consent ACR89 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 5

Special Consent ACR5 Nguyen et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 81

Special Consent SCR81 Niello et al