Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,285 events, each with its source
VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 88

Special Consent AB88 Ta et al. By Seyarto

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 94

Assembly 3rd Reading AB94 Bennett By Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 220

Special Consent AB220 Jackson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 239

Assembly 3rd Reading AB239 Harabedian et al. By Pérez Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 251

Assembly 3rd Reading AB251 Kalra By Wahab

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 321

Assembly 3rd Reading AB321 Schultz et al. By Wiener

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 323

Special Consent AB323 Fong et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 339

Assembly 3rd Reading AB339 Ortega By Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 343

Special Consent AB343 Pacheco et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 352

Assembly 3rd Reading AB352 Pacheco By Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 399

Assembly 3rd Reading AB399 Boerner et al. By Padilla

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 413

Special Consent AB413 Fong

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 424

Special Consent AB424 Davies

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 480

Special Consent AB480 Quirk-Silva By McNerney

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 486

Special Consent AB486 Lackey

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 489

Special Consent AB489 Bonta et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 509

Assembly 3rd Reading AB509 Flora By Rubio

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 542

Special Consent AB542 Celeste Rodriguez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 563

Special Consent AB563 Jackson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 568

Assembly 3rd Reading AB568 Macedo By Grove

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 592

Assembly 3rd Reading AB592 Gabriel et al. By Rubio

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 620

Special Consent AB620 Jackson

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 645

Special Consent AB645 Carrillo et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 651

Special Consent AB651 Bryan et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 681

Assembly 3rd Reading AB681 Elhawary By Pérez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 697

Assembly 3rd Reading AB697 Wilson By Cabaldon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 759

Special Consent AB759 Valencia By Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 774

Special Consent AB774 Bauer-Kahan

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 779

Assembly 3rd Reading AB779 Lackey et al. By Valladares

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 790

Special Consent AB790 Ávila Farías et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 830

Assembly 3rd Reading AB830 Rogers By Grove

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 833

Assembly 3rd Reading AB833 Alvarez By Caballero

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 848

Special Consent AB848 Soria

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 931

Assembly 3rd Reading AB931 Kalra By Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 993

Special Consent AB993 Hadwick

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 996

Special Consent AB996 Pellerin

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1002

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1002 Gabriel et al. By Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1046

Special Consent AB1046 Bains

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1067

Special Consent AB1067 Quirk-Silva

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1072

Special Consent AB1072 Pellerin

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1076

Special Consent AB1076 Addis

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1087

Special Consent AB1087 Patterson By Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1134

Special Consent AB1134 Bains et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1136

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1136 Ortega et al. By Durazo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1200

Special Consent AB1200 Caloza

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1225

Special Consent AB1225 Bennett et al. By Niello

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1239

Special Consent AB1239 Dixon et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1285

Special Consent AB1285 E.M. (Ransom)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1299

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1299 Bryan et al. By Cortese

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1306

Special Consent AB1306 Muratsuchi