Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,285 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 88

Unfinished Business SB88 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 92

Unfinished Business SB92 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 236

Unfinished Business SB236 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 224

Unfinished Business SB224 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 227

Special Consent SB227 Grayson et al. Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 233

Unfinished Business SB233 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 243

Unfinished Business SB243 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 255

Special Consent SB255 Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 292

Unfinished Business SB292 Cervantes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 298

Unfinished Business SB298 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 302

Unfinished Business SB302 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 307

Unfinished Business SB307 Cervantes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 313

Unfinished Business SB313 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 317

Unfinished Business SB317 Hurtado et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 361

Unfinished Business SB361 Becker Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 373

Unfinished Business SB373 Grove et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 376

Unfinished Business SB376 Valladares Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 402

Unfinished Business SB402 Valladares Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 418

Unfinished Business SB418 Menjivar et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 447

Special Consent SB447 Umberg et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 450

Unfinished Business SB450 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 466

Special Consent SB466 Caballero et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 512

Unfinished Business SB512 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 485

Unfinished Business SB485 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 506

Special Consent SB506 TRANS. (Cortese)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 509

Unfinished Business SB509 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 517

Unfinished Business SB517 Niello Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 533

Unfinished Business SB533 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 571

Unfinished Business SB571 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 578

Unfinished Business SB578 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 586

Unfinished Business SB586 Jones et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 595

Unfinished Business SB595 Choi Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 624

Special Consent SB624 Caballero et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 627

Unfinished Business SB627 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 627

Unfinished Business SB627 Wiener et al. Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 627

Unfinished Business SB627 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 655

Unfinished Business SB655 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 663

Unfinished Business SB663 Allen et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 669

Unfinished Business SB669 McGuire et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 683

Unfinished Business SB683 Cortese Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 686

Special Consent SB686 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 709

Unfinished Business SB709 Menjivar et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 710

Unfinished Business SB710 Blakespear et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 711

Unfinished Business SB711 McNerney Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 717

Unfinished Business SB717 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 766

Unfinished Business SB766 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 771

Unfinished Business SB771 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 779

Unfinished Business SB779 Archuleta Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 792

Unfinished Business SB792 Arreguín et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 793

Unfinished Business SB793 Archuleta Concurrence