Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

4,166 events, each with its source
VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 403

Unfinished Business SB403 Blakespear Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 404

Unfinished Business SB404 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 414

Unfinished Business SB414 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 415

Unfinished Business SB415 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 451

Unfinished Business SB451 Archuleta et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 461

Unfinished Business SB461 Padilla Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 487

Unfinished Business SB487 Grayson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 495

Unfinished Business SB495 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 500

Unfinished Business SB500 Stern Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 541

Unfinished Business SB541 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 547

Unfinished Business SB547 Pérez et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 553

Unfinished Business SB553 Cortese Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 568

Unfinished Business SB568 Niello Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 596

Unfinished Business SB596 Menjivar Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 613

Unfinished Business SB613 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 614

Unfinished Business SB614 Stern et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 616

Unfinished Business SB616 Rubio et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 646

Unfinished Business SB646 Weber Pierson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 629

Unfinished Business SB629 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 630

Unfinished Business SB630 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 635

Unfinished Business SB635 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 638

Unfinished Business SB638 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 641

Unfinished Business SB641 Ashby et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 643

Unfinished Business SB643 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 645

Unfinished Business SB645 Umberg Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 647

Unfinished Business SB647 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 682

Unfinished Business SB682 Allen Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 703

Unfinished Business SB703 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 707

Unfinished Business SB707 Durazo et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 720

Unfinished Business SB720 Ashby et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 733

Unfinished Business SB733 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 744

Unfinished Business SB744 Cabaldon Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 753

Unfinished Business SB753 Cortese Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 756

Unfinished Business SB756 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 760

Unfinished Business SB760 Allen et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 761

Unfinished Business SB761 Ashby et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 763

Unfinished Business SB763 Hurtado Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 767

Unfinished Business SB767 Richardson et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 820

Unfinished Business SB820 Stern Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 852

Unfinished Business SB852 E. & C.A. (Cervantes) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 853

Special Consent SB853 L., P.E. & R. (Smallwood-Cuevas)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 857

Special Consent SB857 PUB. S. (Arreguín)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 864

Unfinished Business SB864 Padilla et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 55

Special Consent SR55 Hurtado

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 59

Special Consent SR59 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 61

Special Consent SR61 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 12

Special Consent ACR12 Quirk-Silva et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 13

Special Consent ACR13 Jackson By Umberg

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 102

Special Consent ACR102 Ramos et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 105

Special Consent ACR105 McKinnor et al