Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

3,724 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 125

Special Consent ACR125 Alanis

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 159

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR159 Kalra et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 193

Special Consent ACR193 Aguiar-Curry et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 212

Special Consent ACR212 Macedo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 216

Special Consent ACR216 Mark González et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 225

Special Consent ACR225 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 226

Special Consent ACR226 Wilson et al. By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 227

Special Consent ACR227 Sharp-Collins

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 9

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR9 Wallis et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 17

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR17 Celeste Rodriguez By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 29

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR29 Berman et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 108

Special Consent SR108 Hurtado et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 123

Special Consent SR123 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 128

Senate 3rd Reading SR128 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 129

Special Consent SR129 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 130

Senate 3rd Reading SR130 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 131

Special Consent SR131 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 132

Senate 3rd Reading SR132 Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 134

Senate 3rd Reading SR134 Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 135

Senate 3rd Reading SR135 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 136

Senate 3rd Reading SR136 Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 137

Senate 3rd Reading SR137 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 108

Special Consent SCR108 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 142

Special Consent SCR142 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 188

Special Consent SCR188 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 191

Special Consent SCR191 Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 195

Special Consent SCR195 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 196

Special Consent SCR196 Limón et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 230

Consent Calendar 2nd AB230 Ransom et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1145

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1145 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1199

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1199 Patterson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1278

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1278 Harabedian

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1569

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1569 Davies et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1622

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1622 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1636

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1636 Solache

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1652

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1652 Patterson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1689

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1689 Quirk-Silva

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1756

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1756 Jeff Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1760

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1760 Arambula

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1873

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1873 Bennett

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1912

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1912 Hadwick et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1913

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1913 Soria

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1928

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1928 Fong et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1950

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1950 Harabedian

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1956

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1956 Valencia et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1982

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1982 Lowenthal et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2028

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2028 Chen