Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

3,985 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 46

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 868

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 886

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 891

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 936

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Business, Professions and Economic Development]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 941

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 943

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 948

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 978

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Labor, Public Employment and Retirement ]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 985

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Emergency Management]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1009

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 118

Be adopted. Ordered to third reading

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 76

Senate 3rd Reading SR76 Menjivar et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 114

Senate 3rd Reading SCR114 Grove

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 85

Senate 3rd Reading SR85 Umberg

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 127

Special Consent ACR127 Muratsuchi et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 128

Special Consent ACR128 Stefani et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 132

Special Consent ACR132 Dixon et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 134

Special Consent ACR134 Bryan et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 110

Senate 3rd Reading SCR110 Grove et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 127

Senate 3rd Reading SCR127 Allen et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 137

Senate 3rd Reading SCR137 Ashby

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 79

Senate 3rd Reading SR79 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 83

Senate 3rd Reading SR83 McNerney

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 120

Senate 3rd Reading SCR120 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 126

Senate 3rd Reading SCR126 Grove

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 135

Senate 3rd Reading SCR135 Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 82

Senate 3rd Reading SR82 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 84

Senate 3rd Reading SR84 Caballero et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 81

Senate 3rd Reading SR81 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 125

Senate 3rd Reading SCR125 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 69

Senate 3rd Reading SR69 Niello

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 122

Senate 3rd Reading SCR122 Weber Pierson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 107

Assembly 3rd Reading AB107 Gabriel By Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 117

Assembly 3rd Reading AB117 BUDGET (Gabriel) By Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SR 78

Senate 3rd Reading SR78 Cabaldon et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 121

Special Consent ACR121 Tangipa et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 112

Special Consent ACR112 Gallagher et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 116

Special Consent ACR116 Jackson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 118

Special Consent ACR118 Mark González et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 120

Special Consent ACR120 Ávila Farías et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 122

Special Consent ACR122 Ahrens et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 89

Senate 3rd Reading SCR89 Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 107

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 117

Do pass

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 72

Senate 3rd Reading SR72 Wahab et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 73

Special Consent SR73 Choi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 71

Special Consent ACR71 Kalra et al. By Cortese

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 115

Special Consent ACR115 Bennett et al. By Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 117

Special Consent ACR117 Sharp-Collins