Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Eloise Reyes

Eloise Reyes

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 29

In office
2024–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

Record of service
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 47 · former
  • State Senate · Senate District 29 · 2024–present
  • State Assembly · Assembly District 50 · 2022–
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Eloise Gómez Reyes comes to Senate District 29 after representing urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County in the Assembly, including Rialto, Colton and Fontana. Her route to the Senate ran through a legal career, a congressional campaign, an Assembly contest against another Democrat and service as Assembly majority leader. She has continued to identify with that wing of the Legislature as a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Since 2024, Reyes has represented the 29th district in the California State Senate.

BEFORE ELECTED OFFICE

Reyes was born on January 27, 1956. Before she was elected to the Assembly, she worked as an attorney.

That legal career is the only documented professional chapter preceding her campaigns for office. In 2014, Reyes ran for the United States House of Representatives in the 31st Congressional District.

THE ASSEMBLY CONTEST

In 2016, Reyes ran for the 47th Assembly district.

Reyes’ case against Brown was explicit: she said Brown was not progressive enough. Reyes defeated her and won election to the Assembly in 2016.

She did not enter the Assembly merely as a Democrat succeeding a politician from the other party. She defeated a fellow Democrat after arguing that the district should have more progressive representation.

Reyes later became a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. The caucus membership carried into office the same broad alignment she had stated during the campaign against Brown.

DISTRICT WORK AND LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP

Reyes was first elected from the 47th Assembly district and subsequently represented the 50th Assembly district. The 50th covered urban parts of southwestern San Bernardino County and included Rialto, Colton and Fontana.

The record identifies the district by its urban San Bernardino County communities rather than by a single city, requiring representation across several municipal lines.

Reyes also served as majority leader of the California State Assembly. That position placed her career on two tracks at once: representation of the 50th district and leadership within the Assembly’s Democratic majority.

The available facts do not identify a particular bill, budget negotiation, committee assignment or floor dispute from her tenure as majority leader. They do establish that Reyes moved from winning an intraparty Assembly contest in 2016 to holding one of the chamber’s leadership titles. Her legislative profile therefore includes both a defined progressive affiliation and formal service in the Assembly majority’s leadership.

THE MOVE TO THE SENATE

Reyes joined the California State Senate in 2024 as the representative for Senate District 29. She entered the chamber with prior experience as an attorney, an Assembly district representative and an Assembly majority leader.

The move changed the office and the district number, but the political identifiers in her record remained consistent. Reyes is a Democrat and a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Her first successful campaign had already placed that progressive identification at the center of a contest with another Democrat.

She won an Assembly seat by challenging a fellow Democrat from the left, represented urban communities in southwestern San Bernardino County, became Assembly majority leader and moved to the Senate in 2024.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Reyes’ clearest documented policy identifier is her progressive alignment rather than a particular enacted bill. The record supplies no named legislation, vote, regulatory fight or budget provision from which to construct a more specific policy signature.

Reyes said Cheryl Brown was not progressive enough, defeated Brown in the 2016 Assembly race and later joined the California Legislative Progressive Caucus. Those are not inferred positions; they are the stated and organizational markers of Reyes’ place within Democratic legislative politics.

Her service as Assembly majority leader adds the institutional side of that profile.

The documented facts do not name a union, industry, developer, donor network or other organized interest as the principal beneficiary of her work. Nor do they identify a specific population or cause attached to legislation bearing her name. Assigning her a more precise constituency of interest would go beyond the record.

What voters can say with confidence is narrower but clear: Reyes is most closely identified with the progressive side of the Democratic Party, an identity she used to distinguish herself from another Democrat when she first won office and one she has maintained through caucus membership. Her public career combines that ideological affiliation with representation of San Bernardino County’s urban communities and experience in Assembly leadership.

The record

3,606 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 170

W/O REF. TO FILE SB170 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 171

W/O REF. TO FILE SB171 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 172

W/O REF. TO FILE SB172 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 177

W/O REF. TO FILE SB177 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 180

W/O REF. TO FILE SB180 B. & F.R. (Laird)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 719

W/O REF. TO FILE SB719 Cabaldon Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 1350

W/O REF. TO FILE SB1350 McNerney Urgency Clause

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 113

Senate 3rd Reading SR113 Choi et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 185

Senate 3rd Reading SCR185 Caballero

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SJR 16

Senate 3rd Reading SJR16 Caballero et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 34

Consent Calendar 2nd AB34 Patterson et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 35

Consent Calendar 2nd AB35 Alvarez et al. Urgency Clause

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1587

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1587 Ta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1651

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1651 Dixon

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1653

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1653 Lackey

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1683

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1683 INS. (Calderon)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 1736

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1736 Pellerin

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2090

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2090 Macedo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2147

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2147 Schiavo

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2320

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2320 Ta

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2331

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2331 Nguyen

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2421

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2421 Valencia

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2641

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2641 Michelle Rodriguez

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2652

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2652 Sharp-Collins et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2655

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2655 Valencia

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2789

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2789 JUD. (Kalra)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AB 2791

Consent Calendar 2nd AB2791 NAT. RES. (Bryan)

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 417

Unfinished Business SB417 Limón et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SB 623

Unfinished Business SB623 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 191

Special Consent ACR191 Stefani et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 206

Special Consent ACR206 Stefani et al. By Blakespear

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACR 215

Special Consent ACR215 Petrie-Norris

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 113

Senate 3rd Reading SCR113 Grove

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on SCR 189

Senate 3rd Reading SCR189 Rubio et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on AJR 27

Consent Calendar 2nd AJR27 Harabedian et al

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACA 20

W/O REF. TO FILE ACA20 Gabriel By Laird

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACA 21

W/O REF. TO FILE ACA21 Rivas By Ashby

VoteAbsent
Voted Absent on ACA 22

W/O REF. TO FILE ACA22 Wicks By Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 302

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 710

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 713

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1381

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy, Digital Technologies, and Consumer Protection]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1534

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Labor, Public Employment and Retirement ]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1547

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1577

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1669

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1728

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1831

Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2065

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 2149

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]