Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Angelique Ashby

Angelique Ashby

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 8

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Angelique Ashby’s route through Sacramento runs from Sacramento High School to the City Council and now the State Senate. Her family moved to the region while she was in elementary school, settling first in Roseville and later in the City of Sacramento. She spent 12 years on the Sacramento City Council, representing the first district and serving seven times as vice mayor or mayor pro tem. In 2022, District 8 voters chose her after a costly contest between two Democrats. Her record includes work on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change, alongside a personal history of using social services and consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

ROOTS

Ashby was born in Ashland, Oregon, on March 20, 1975. After her family moved to the Greater Sacramento region, she attended Sierra Gardens Elementary School and Warren T. Eich Junior High in Roseville. The family later moved into Sacramento, where she graduated from Sacramento High School.

She became a single mother at 20. She lived in low-income housing and used subsidized childcare, food assistance and other social service programs. She later earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Davis, and a law degree from the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.

Her father had headed California’s state foster care system. Ashby and her late father founded a consulting firm that created programs to assist parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

CITY HALL TO THE SENATE

Ashby was elected to the Sacramento City Council in 2010. During her 12 years there, her work included homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change. She was the council’s only female member for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while holding office.

Her 2022 campaign for Senate District 8 became one of the most expensive state races on record, with $14.5 million spent, according to Cal Matters. Ashby and former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones both ran as Democrats. Her endorsements included former state senator Richard Pan, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former governor Jerry Brown and EMILY’s List.

The campaign also produced a fight over how Ashby could describe herself to voters. Jones sued the California secretary of state to remove her ballot designation as a “women’s advocate,” arguing that it was not a profession. Ashby changed the designation to “Sacramento City Councilwoman.”

She finished second to Jones in the June 7 primary, then won the Nov. 8 general election. Jones conceded on Nov. 29 after Ashby’s election-night lead grew with each ballot-count update. The result made Ashby the first woman in more than 20 years elected to the State Senate representing the majority of Sacramento County, and only the second woman ever to do so.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Ashby’s documented record includes her personal use of low-income housing and social service programs; consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women; and City Council work focused on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change.

She was the lone woman on the City Council for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while in office. Her Senate campaign received support from EMILY’s List, Richard Pan, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown.

The 2022 campaign also included the dispute over her proposed “women’s advocate” ballot designation, the lawsuit filed by Jones and her revised designation as “Sacramento City Councilwoman.” After winning the general election, she became a member of the California State Senate representing District 8 in December 2022.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 8 · 2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Angelique Ashby’s route through Sacramento runs from Sacramento High School to the City Council and now the State Senate. Her family moved to the region while she was in elementary school, settling first in Roseville and later in the City of Sacramento. She spent 12 years on the Sacramento City Council, representing the first district and serving seven times as vice mayor or mayor pro tem. In 2022, District 8 voters chose her after a costly contest between two Democrats. Her record includes work on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change, alongside a personal history of using social services and consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

ROOTS

Ashby was born in Ashland, Oregon, on March 20, 1975. After her family moved to the Greater Sacramento region, she attended Sierra Gardens Elementary School and Warren T. Eich Junior High in Roseville. The family later moved into Sacramento, where she graduated from Sacramento High School.

She became a single mother at 20. She lived in low-income housing and used subsidized childcare, food assistance and other social service programs. She later earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Davis, and a law degree from the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.

Her father had headed California’s state foster care system. Ashby and her late father founded a consulting firm that created programs to assist parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

CITY HALL TO THE SENATE

Ashby was elected to the Sacramento City Council in 2010. During her 12 years there, her work included homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change. She was the council’s only female member for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while holding office.

Her 2022 campaign for Senate District 8 became one of the most expensive state races on record, with $14.5 million spent, according to Cal Matters. Ashby and former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones both ran as Democrats. Her endorsements included former state senator Richard Pan, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former governor Jerry Brown and EMILY’s List.

The campaign also produced a fight over how Ashby could describe herself to voters. Jones sued the California secretary of state to remove her ballot designation as a “women’s advocate,” arguing that it was not a profession. Ashby changed the designation to “Sacramento City Councilwoman.”

She finished second to Jones in the June 7 primary, then won the Nov. 8 general election. Jones conceded on Nov. 29 after Ashby’s election-night lead grew with each ballot-count update. The result made Ashby the first woman in more than 20 years elected to the State Senate representing the majority of Sacramento County, and only the second woman ever to do so.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Ashby’s documented record includes her personal use of low-income housing and social service programs; consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women; and City Council work focused on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change.

She was the lone woman on the City Council for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while in office. Her Senate campaign received support from EMILY’s List, Richard Pan, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown.

The 2022 campaign also included the dispute over her proposed “women’s advocate” ballot designation, the lawsuit filed by Jones and her revised designation as “Sacramento City Councilwoman.” After winning the general election, she became a member of the California State Senate representing District 8 in December 2022.

The record

4,201 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 107

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR107 Bauer-Kahan By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 125

Special Consent ACR125 Alanis

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 159

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR159 Kalra et al. By Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 162

Assembly 3rd Reading ACR162 Hadwick et al. By Strickland

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 193

Special Consent ACR193 Aguiar-Curry et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 212

Special Consent ACR212 Macedo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 216

Special Consent ACR216 Mark González et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 225

Special Consent ACR225 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 226

Special Consent ACR226 Wilson et al. By Smallwood-Cuevas

VoteYea
Voted Yea on ACR 227

Special Consent ACR227 Sharp-Collins

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 9

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR9 Wallis et al. By Laird

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 17

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR17 Celeste Rodriguez By Arreguín

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AJR 29

Assembly 3rd Reading AJR29 Berman et al. By Wiener

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 108

Special Consent SR108 Hurtado et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 123

Special Consent SR123 Weber Pierson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 128

Senate 3rd Reading SR128 Pérez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 129

Special Consent SR129 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 130

Senate 3rd Reading SR130 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 131

Special Consent SR131 Durazo et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 132

Senate 3rd Reading SR132 Durazo

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 134

Senate 3rd Reading SR134 Wahab

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 135

Senate 3rd Reading SR135 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 136

Senate 3rd Reading SR136 Ochoa Bogh

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SR 137

Senate 3rd Reading SR137 Ochoa Bogh et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 108

Special Consent SCR108 Archuleta et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 142

Special Consent SCR142 Becker et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 188

Special Consent SCR188 Pérez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 191

Special Consent SCR191 Seyarto

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 195

Special Consent SCR195 Reyes et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SCR 196

Special Consent SCR196 Limón et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 230

Consent Calendar 2nd AB230 Ransom et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1145

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1145 Jeff Gonzalez et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1199

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1199 Patterson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1278

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1278 Harabedian

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1569

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1569 Davies et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1622

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1622 Blanca Rubio et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1636

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1636 Solache

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1652

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1652 Patterson et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1689

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1689 Quirk-Silva

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1756

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1756 Jeff Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1760

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1760 Arambula

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1873

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1873 Bennett

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1912

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1912 Hadwick et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1913

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1913 Soria

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1928

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1928 Fong et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1950

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1950 Harabedian

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1956

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1956 Valencia et al

VoteYea
Voted Yea on AB 1982

Consent Calendar 2nd AB1982 Lowenthal et al