Politracks is a work in progress under active development — data may be incomplete while we build.
Politracks
Portrait of Angelique Ashby

Angelique Ashby

Democratic

State Senate · Senate District 8

In office
2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed

Angelique Ashby’s route through Sacramento runs from Sacramento High School to the City Council and now the State Senate. Her family moved to the region while she was in elementary school, settling first in Roseville and later in the City of Sacramento. She spent 12 years on the Sacramento City Council, representing the first district and serving seven times as vice mayor or mayor pro tem. In 2022, District 8 voters chose her after a costly contest between two Democrats. Her record includes work on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change, alongside a personal history of using social services and consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

ROOTS

Ashby was born in Ashland, Oregon, on March 20, 1975. After her family moved to the Greater Sacramento region, she attended Sierra Gardens Elementary School and Warren T. Eich Junior High in Roseville. The family later moved into Sacramento, where she graduated from Sacramento High School.

She became a single mother at 20. She lived in low-income housing and used subsidized childcare, food assistance and other social service programs. She later earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Davis, and a law degree from the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.

Her father had headed California’s state foster care system. Ashby and her late father founded a consulting firm that created programs to assist parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

CITY HALL TO THE SENATE

Ashby was elected to the Sacramento City Council in 2010. During her 12 years there, her work included homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change. She was the council’s only female member for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while holding office.

Her 2022 campaign for Senate District 8 became one of the most expensive state races on record, with $14.5 million spent, according to Cal Matters. Ashby and former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones both ran as Democrats. Her endorsements included former state senator Richard Pan, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former governor Jerry Brown and EMILY’s List.

The campaign also produced a fight over how Ashby could describe herself to voters. Jones sued the California secretary of state to remove her ballot designation as a “women’s advocate,” arguing that it was not a profession. Ashby changed the designation to “Sacramento City Councilwoman.”

She finished second to Jones in the June 7 primary, then won the Nov. 8 general election. Jones conceded on Nov. 29 after Ashby’s election-night lead grew with each ballot-count update. The result made Ashby the first woman in more than 20 years elected to the State Senate representing the majority of Sacramento County, and only the second woman ever to do so.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Ashby’s documented record includes her personal use of low-income housing and social service programs; consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women; and City Council work focused on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change.

She was the lone woman on the City Council for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while in office. Her Senate campaign received support from EMILY’s List, Richard Pan, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown.

The 2022 campaign also included the dispute over her proposed “women’s advocate” ballot designation, the lawsuit filed by Jones and her revised designation as “Sacramento City Councilwoman.” After winning the general election, she became a member of the California State Senate representing District 8 in December 2022.

Record of service
  • State Senate · Senate District 8 · 2022–present
BiographyReporting (Tier 3) · reviewed before publication

Angelique Ashby’s route through Sacramento runs from Sacramento High School to the City Council and now the State Senate. Her family moved to the region while she was in elementary school, settling first in Roseville and later in the City of Sacramento. She spent 12 years on the Sacramento City Council, representing the first district and serving seven times as vice mayor or mayor pro tem. In 2022, District 8 voters chose her after a costly contest between two Democrats. Her record includes work on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change, alongside a personal history of using social services and consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

ROOTS

Ashby was born in Ashland, Oregon, on March 20, 1975. After her family moved to the Greater Sacramento region, she attended Sierra Gardens Elementary School and Warren T. Eich Junior High in Roseville. The family later moved into Sacramento, where she graduated from Sacramento High School.

She became a single mother at 20. She lived in low-income housing and used subsidized childcare, food assistance and other social service programs. She later earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of California, Davis, and a law degree from the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.

Her father had headed California’s state foster care system. Ashby and her late father founded a consulting firm that created programs to assist parolees, foster children and incarcerated women.

CITY HALL TO THE SENATE

Ashby was elected to the Sacramento City Council in 2010. During her 12 years there, her work included homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change. She was the council’s only female member for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while holding office.

Her 2022 campaign for Senate District 8 became one of the most expensive state races on record, with $14.5 million spent, according to Cal Matters. Ashby and former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones both ran as Democrats. Her endorsements included former state senator Richard Pan, Gov. Gavin Newsom, former governor Jerry Brown and EMILY’s List.

The campaign also produced a fight over how Ashby could describe herself to voters. Jones sued the California secretary of state to remove her ballot designation as a “women’s advocate,” arguing that it was not a profession. Ashby changed the designation to “Sacramento City Councilwoman.”

She finished second to Jones in the June 7 primary, then won the Nov. 8 general election. Jones conceded on Nov. 29 after Ashby’s election-night lead grew with each ballot-count update. The result made Ashby the first woman in more than 20 years elected to the State Senate representing the majority of Sacramento County, and only the second woman ever to do so.

THE POLICY SIGNATURE

Ashby’s documented record includes her personal use of low-income housing and social service programs; consulting programs for parolees, foster children and incarcerated women; and City Council work focused on homelessness, school funding, literacy, economic development, infrastructure and climate change.

She was the lone woman on the City Council for more than six years and the first female councilmember to give birth while in office. Her Senate campaign received support from EMILY’s List, Richard Pan, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown.

The 2022 campaign also included the dispute over her proposed “women’s advocate” ballot designation, the lawsuit filed by Jones and her revised designation as “Sacramento City Councilwoman.” After winning the general election, she became a member of the California State Senate representing District 8 in December 2022.

The record

4,426 events, each with its source
VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 24

Unfinished Business SB24 McNerney et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 27

Unfinished Business SB27 Umberg Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence Reconsider

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Motion to Reconsider Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 34

Unfinished Business SB34 Richardson Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 37

Unfinished Business SB37 Umberg Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 42

Unfinished Business SB42 Umberg et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 48

W/O REF. TO FILE SB48 Gonzalez

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 53

Unfinished Business SB53 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 57

Unfinished Business SB57 Padilla et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 59

Unfinished Business SB59 Wiener et al. Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 63

Unfinished Business SB63 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 67

Unfinished Business SB67 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 75

Unfinished Business SB75 Smallwood-Cuevas Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 78

Unfinished Business SB78 Seyarto et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 79

Unfinished Business SB79 Wiener et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 80

Unfinished Business SB80 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 105

Unfinished Business SB105 Wiener Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 146

Unfinished Business SB146 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 147

Unfinished Business SB147 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 148

Unfinished Business SB148 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 151

Unfinished Business SB151 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 153

Unfinished Business SB153 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 155

Unfinished Business SB155 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 156

Unfinished Business SB156 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 157

Unfinished Business SB157 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 158

W/O REF. TO FILE SB158 B. & F.R. (Wiener)

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 159

Unfinished Business SB159 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 160

Unfinished Business SB160 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 161

Unfinished Business SB161 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 162

Unfinished Business SB162 B. & F.R. (Wiener) Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 237

W/O REF. TO FILE SB237 Grayson

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 245

Unfinished Business SB245 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 254

W/O REF. TO FILE SB254 Becker

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 258

Unfinished Business SB258 Wahab et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 271

Unfinished Business SB271 Reyes Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 274

Unfinished Business SB274 Cervantes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 293

Unfinished Business SB293 Pérez Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 294

Unfinished Business SB294 Reyes et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 326

Unfinished Business SB326 Becker et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 351

Unfinished Business SB351 Cabaldon et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 352

W/O REF. TO FILE SB352 Reyes

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 364

Unfinished Business SB364 Strickland et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 378

Unfinished Business SB378 Wiener Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 400

Unfinished Business SB400 Cortese Urgency Clause Concurrence

VoteNay
Voted Nay on SB 403

Unfinished Business SB403 Blakespear Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 404

Unfinished Business SB404 Caballero et al. Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 414

Unfinished Business SB414 Ashby Concurrence

VoteYea
Voted Yea on SB 415

Unfinished Business SB415 Reyes et al. Concurrence